Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
ATGCX vs FSMAX
ATGCX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts ATGCX vs FSMAX
Aquila Opportunity Growth C
Price$27.67
Change-$0.45 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity Extended Market Index
Price$92.50
Change-$1.21 (-1.29%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
ATGCX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ATGCX vs. FSMAX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATGCX is a StrongSell and FSMAX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 40B vs. ATGCX (90.3M). FSMAX pays higher dividends than ATGCX: FSMAX (1.10) vs ATGCX (0.00). ATGCX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: ATGCX (29 years) vs FSMAX (13 years). ATGCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.00 vs. FSMAX (18.00). FSMAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ATGCX: FSMAX (0) vs ATGCX (1000). FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.21 vs. ATGCX (22.33). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 51.19 vs. ATGCX (-34.18).
| ATGCX | FSMAX | ATGCX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.922 | 18.499 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 90.3M | 40B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.10 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 22.33 | 35.21 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | -27.94 | -0.08 | 32,967% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.18 | 51.19 | -67% |
| Returns for 10 years | -24.91 | 81.58 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...