BBDC vs FCFS ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBDC is a Hold and FCFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBDC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFCFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BBDC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- FCFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBDC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCFS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BBDC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- FCFS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BBDC (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while FCFS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -13.18% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.43%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -0.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBDC is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
FCFS is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-1.03% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-0.27% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
| BBDC | FCFS | BBDC / FCFS | |
| Capitalization | 979M | 5.75B | 17% |
| EBITDA | N/A | 907M | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.734 | 6.069 | 226% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.69 | 26.15 | 29% |
| Revenue | 140M | 3.15B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 57.2M | 127M | 45% |
| Total Debt | 1.44B | 1.92B | 75% |
BBDC | FCFS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 96 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 31 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBDC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FCFS (96) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew significantly faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
BBDC's Profit vs Risk Rating (33) in the null industry is in the same range as FCFS (43) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
BBDC's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCFS (67) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
BBDC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FCFS (58) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BBDC’s stock grew similarly to FCFS’s over the last 12 months.
FCFS's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBDC (99) in the null industry. This means that FCFS’s stock grew significantly faster than BBDC’s over the last 12 months.
| BBDC | FCFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 42% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 42% | 10 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 36% | 3 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 58% |
FCFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCFS has been loosely correlated with CAR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FCFS jumps, then CAR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FCFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCFS | 100% | +1.46% | ||
| CAR - FCFS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| UPBD - FCFS | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.85% | ||
| EZPW - FCFS | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| NNI - FCFS | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| COOP - FCFS | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||