Ad is loading...
BCAKX vs FHKCX
BCAKX vs FHKCX Comparison
Open Charts BCAKX vs FHKCX
Baillie Gifford China A Shares K
Price$8.36
Change-$1.80 (-17.72%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Fidelity China Region
Price$41.29
Change-$0.02 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BCAKX vs FHKCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCAKX vs. FHKCX commentary
Oct 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCAKX is a Hold and FHKCX is a StrongSell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKCX has more cash in the bank: 1.2B vs. BCAKX (970K). FHKCX pays higher dividends than BCAKX: FHKCX (1.84) vs BCAKX (0.03). BCAKX was incepted earlier than FHKCX: BCAKX (5 years) vs FHKCX (29 years). FHKCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. BCAKX (5.00). FHKCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BCAKX: FHKCX (0) vs BCAKX (10000000). FHKCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 31.45 vs. BCAKX (7.54).
| BCAKX | FHKCX | BCAKX / FHKCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.140 | 29.053 | 45% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 970K | 1.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.03 | 1.84 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.54 | 31.45 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | -46.79 | -16.84 | 278% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 20.55 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers