BCSAU
Price
$11.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
STJO
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 25 closing price
Ad is loading...

BCSAU vs STJO

Header iconBCSAU vs STJO Comparison
Open Charts BCSAU vs STJOBanner chart's image
Blockchain Coinvestors Acquisition
Price$11.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.63K
CapitalizationN/A
St. Joseph
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.53K
CapitalizationN/A
BCSAU vs STJO Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCSAU vs. STJO commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSAU is a Hold and STJO is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (BCSAU: $11.56 vs. STJO: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: BCSAU and STJO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCSAU: 294% vs. STJO: 283%
Market capitalization -- BCSAU: $0 vs. STJO: $96.01K
BCSAU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. STJO’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $96.01K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCSAU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTJO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BCSAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • STJO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCSAU is a better buy in the long-term than STJO.

Price Growth

BCSAU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +1.40% price change this week, while STJO (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.24% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCSAU YTD gains are higher at: 5.571 vs. STJO (-63.380). STJO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.69K vs. BCSAU (-3.9M). BCSAU has more cash in the bank: 222K vs. STJO (27.5K). STJO has less debt than BCSAU: STJO (74.7K) vs BCSAU (1.77M). BCSAU (0) and STJO (0) have equivalent revenues.
BCSAUSTJOBCSAU / STJO
CapitalizationN/A96K-
EBITDA-3.9M7.69K-50,704%
Gain YTD5.571-63.380-9%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash222K27.5K807%
Total Debt1.77M74.7K2,365%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STJO: Fundamental Ratings
STJO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
97
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SWHFX27.79N/A
N/A
Schwab Health Care
ARIHX9.46N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity I
SSEYX549.77-1.56
-0.28%
State Street Equity 500 Index II
RYSOX91.66-0.27
-0.29%
Rydex S&P 500 A
BGIUX14.16-0.19
-1.29%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha 4

BCSAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCSAU has been loosely correlated with FRLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BCSAU jumps, then FRLA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCSAU
1D Price
Change %
BCSAU100%
N/A
FRLA - BCSAU
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
LNZA - BCSAU
58%
Loosely correlated
-12.19%
BLEU - BCSAU
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
APXIU - BCSAU
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IVCAU - BCSAU
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STJO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STJO has been loosely correlated with ROCL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STJO jumps, then ROCL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STJO
1D Price
Change %
STJO100%
N/A
ROCL - STJO
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
APXIU - STJO
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BCSAU - STJO
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBHGF - STJO
9%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
QMEI - STJO
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More