BCSF
Price
$16.64
Change
+$0.11 (+0.67%)
Updated
Apr 30, 6:59 PM EST
5 days until earnings call
SLRC
Price
$15.36
Change
-$0.18 (-1.16%)
Updated
Apr 30, 6:59 PM EST
8 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCSF vs SLRC ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconBCSF vs SLRC Comparison
Open Charts BCSF vs SLRCBanner chart's image
Bain Capital Specialty Finance
Price$16.64
Change+$0.11 (+0.67%)
Volume$183.11K
CapitalizationN/A
SLR Investment
Price$15.36
Change-$0.18 (-1.16%)
Volume$104.38K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BCSF vs SLRC Comparison Chart

Loading...

BCSFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SLRCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
BCSF vs. SLRC commentary
May 01, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCSF is a Hold and SLRC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 01, 2024
Stock price -- (BCSF: $16.63 vs. SLRC: $15.54)
Brand notoriety: BCSF and SLRC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCSF: 114% vs. SLRC: 59%
Market capitalization -- BCSF: $1B vs. SLRC: $837.41M
BCSF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $1B. SLRC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $837.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCSF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLRC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BCSF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLRC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the long-term than SLRC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLRC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCSF is a better buy in the short-term than SLRC.

Price Growth

BCSF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.46% price change this week, while SLRC (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCSF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.

SLRC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.41% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BCSF with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for SLRC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BCSF($1B) has a higher market cap than SLRC($837M). SLRC has higher P/E ratio than BCSF: SLRC (10.84) vs BCSF (8.14). BCSF YTD gains are higher at: 13.543 vs. SLRC (6.162). BCSF has more cash in the bank: 43M vs. SLRC (11.9M). SLRC has less debt than BCSF: SLRC (1.18B) vs BCSF (1.26B). BCSF has higher revenues than SLRC: BCSF (138M) vs SLRC (86.5M).
BCSFSLRCBCSF / SLRC
Capitalization1B837M120%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD13.5436.162220%
P/E Ratio8.1410.8475%
Revenue138M86.5M160%
Total Cash43M11.9M361%
Total Debt1.26B1.18B107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SLRC: Fundamental Ratings
SLRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
32
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSFSLRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCSFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
SLRCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIBAX24.57-0.21
-0.85%
Thornburg Investment Income Builder A
FHEIX15.36-0.24
-1.54%
Fidelity Advisor Real Estate I
LGILX23.01-0.40
-1.71%
Schwab Select Large Cap Growth
GITIX30.38-0.71
-2.28%
Goldman Sachs Technology Opps Inst
PSPFX3.98-0.13
-3.16%
US Global Investors Global Res

SLRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SLRC has been closely correlated with CGBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SLRC jumps, then CGBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLRC
1D Price
Change %
SLRC100%
+0.13%
CGBD - SLRC
66%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
ARCC - SLRC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.14%
MFIC - SLRC
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
PFLT - SLRC
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
NMFC - SLRC
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More