BDL
Price
$26.23
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
70 days until earnings call
YUMC
Price
$34.90
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BDL vs YUMC

Header iconBDL vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts BDL vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Flanigan's Enterprises
Price$26.23
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$388
CapitalizationN/A
Yum China Holdings
Price$34.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.1M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BDL vs YUMC Comparison Chart
Loading...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BDL vs. YUMC commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BDL is a Buy and YUMC is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (BDL: $26.23 vs. YUMC: $34.90)
Brand notoriety: BDL: Not notable vs. YUMC: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BDL: 17% vs. YUMC: 109%
Market capitalization -- BDL: $48.75M vs. YUMC: $13.33B
BDL [@Restaurants] is valued at $48.75M. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $13.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $212.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BDL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BDL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BDL is a better buy in the long-term than YUMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

YUMC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • YUMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BDL (@Restaurants) experienced а -3.67% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +2.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +4.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

BDL is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+4.57% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($13.3B) has a higher market cap than BDL($48.8M). YUMC (16.78) and BDL (15.99) have similar P/E ratio . BDL YTD gains are higher at: 3.925 vs. YUMC (-16.667). YUMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.56B vs. BDL (18M). YUMC has more cash in the bank: 2.48B vs. BDL (22.1M). BDL has less debt than YUMC: BDL (48.9M) vs YUMC (2.71B). YUMC has higher revenues than BDL: YUMC (11B) vs BDL (184M).
BDLYUMCBDL / YUMC
Capitalization48.8M13.3B0%
EBITDA18M1.56B1%
Gain YTD3.925-16.667-24%
P/E Ratio15.9916.7895%
Revenue184M11B2%
Total Cash22.1M2.48B1%
Total Debt48.9M2.71B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BDL vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
BDL
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2719
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61100
SMR RATING
1..100
8460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2492
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BDL's Valuation (22) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (28). This means that BDL’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (100). This means that BDL’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's SMR Rating (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as BDL (84). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to BDL’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUMC (60). This means that BDL’s stock grew similarly to YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

BDL's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for YUMC (92). This means that BDL’s stock grew significantly faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
YUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
YUMC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMBNX41.280.33
+0.81%
RMB Mendon Financial Services C
ITCSX28.56N/A
N/A
VY® T. Rowe Price Capital Apprec S
BGLUX34.81-0.08
-0.23%
Baron Global Advantage R6
MAILX20.21-0.09
-0.44%
BlackRock International Instl
BRZKX12.04-0.06
-0.50%
BlackRock Sus Adg Intl Eq K

BDL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BDL and FAT have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BDL and FAT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BDL
1D Price
Change %
BDL100%
+0.08%
FAT - BDL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
GTIM - BDL
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.72%
FWRG - BDL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BROS - BDL
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
YUMC - BDL
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
More

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YUMC and FRSH have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YUMC and FRSH's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
+1.07%
FRSH - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
QSR - YUMC
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
YUM - YUMC
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.64%
DIN - YUMC
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.60%
CHUY - YUMC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.03%
More