BEN
Price
$36.30Alerts
Change
+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Updated
Nov 11, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.14B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STT
Price
$174.17Alerts
Change
+$2.55 (+1.49%)
Updated
Nov 11 closing price
Capitalization
45.48B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEN vs STT

BEN vs STT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Oct 12, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Franklin Resources (BEN) vs. State Street (STT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Different business models: BEN is a traditional asset manager, while STT combines custody and servicing with asset management.
  • Scale gap: State Street holds roughly $53.8 trillion in assets under custody/administration, versus Franklin Resources' $1.68 trillion in assets under management (AUM).
  • Momentum vs. income: STT has shown stronger recent relative performance and operating leverage, while BEN offers a higher dividend yield of roughly 5%.
  • Earnings trends: Both firms recently beat consensus estimates, but STT's shares pulled back after results while BEN's advanced.
  • Key watch items: Franklin's Western Asset fixed-income outflows and State Street's cloud (software) transition are the main near-term risks.

Introduction

Franklin Resources (BEN) and State Street (STT) are two widely followed financial-services names that often appear side by side in sector screens, yet they occupy very different parts of the asset-management ecosystem. Franklin Resources, operating as Franklin Templeton, earns most of its revenue from investment-management fees across active, ETF (exchange-traded fund), and alternative strategies. State Street is a custody and servicing leader whose State Street Global Advisors unit is best known for the SPDR ETF franchise. For investors weighing a pure-play asset manager against a diversified custody-and-asset-management franchise, this stock comparison highlights meaningful differences in growth drivers, momentum, and risk.

BEN Overview and Recent Performance

Franklin Resources is a global investment manager whose AUM reached a record of roughly $1.68 trillion in recent quarters, supported by broad-based net inflows across public and private markets. Its most recent quarterly results exceeded Wall Street expectations, with revenue up sharply year over year and adjusted earnings per share beating consensus. Management attributed the strength to momentum in alternatives, ETFs, retail separately managed accounts (SMAs), and the Canvas custom-indexing platform, alongside disciplined expense control.

In recent weeks, the firm has reported long-term net inflows, a ninth consecutive quarter of positive flows on a comparable basis when excluding Western Asset Management, which continues to experience fixed-income outflows. Franklin also raised its quarterly dividend and expanded its share-repurchase authorization, reflecting confidence in its capital position. Investor sentiment has improved as diversification into alternatives and private credit offsets persistent pressure in traditional fixed income.

STT Overview and Recent Performance

State Street is one of the world's largest institutional financial-services providers, with roughly $53.8 trillion in assets under custody and/or administration (AUC/A) and about $5.7 trillion in AUM as of its latest reporting period. Its revenue mix spans investment servicing, investment management (including the SPDR ETF suite), FX trading, securities finance, and software. Recent quarterly results outpaced consensus on both revenue and adjusted earnings per share, driven by broad-based fee growth, yet the stock declined in the following session amid a mixed market reaction and elevated repositioning charges.

Recent market activity has favored State Street, with shares approaching 52-week highs on strong fee momentum, record AUC/A and AUM, and continued ETF market-share gains. Management has guided to further fee-revenue growth and margin expansion, while transitioning software clients from on-premises contracts to recurring cloud (SaaS) revenue. This transition is a near-term drag on software fees but is positioned as a driver of more durable future income.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking a data-driven edge in names like BEN and STT, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated view of the platform's strongest automated strategies. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that trade thousands of different tickers, but only the most suitable performers for current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the set of tickers they trade, allowing users to match a bot to their own objectives. Exploring the Trending AI Robots list is a practical way to see how algorithmic approaches are currently positioning across the market.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most important contrast between these two stocks is their business model and revenue quality. BEN depends heavily on investment-management and distribution fees tied to AUM, making it more sensitive to fund flows and market levels. STT earns a large share of its revenue from custody and servicing fees that are less directly tied to fund performance, giving it a steadier, more diversified base, though it remains exposed to interest rates through net interest income (NII) and to market levels through servicing fees.

On growth drivers, State Street's scale in custody, its leading SPDR ETF franchise, and its private-markets and digital-asset initiatives provide structural tailwinds. Franklin's growth narrative centers on alternatives fundraising, active ETFs, and custom indexing. On relative performance, State Street has delivered stronger recent momentum and higher returns on tangible common equity (ROTCE), while Franklin offers a higher dividend yield and a lower valuation. Risk profiles differ too: Franklin faces Western Asset outflows and industry fee compression, while State Street manages a cloud-transition and repositioning costs that have pressured near-term expenses.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, operating leverage, and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward State Street (STT) in the current environment. Its record assets, broader and more diversified revenue base, positive flow trends, and stronger returns on tangible capital suggest a steadier, more consistent trajectory than Franklin Resources' (BEN) still-recovering flow picture. That said, Franklin's higher dividend yield and improving inflow momentum make it a more value-oriented candidate, and the relative preference could shift if Western Asset outflows persist or if State Street's cloud transition weighs longer than expected.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BEN vs. STT commentary
Nov 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEN is a Hold and STT is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
A.I.Advisor
a Summary for BEN with price predictions
Nov 11, 2026

BEN in upward trend: 10-day moving average crossed above 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026

The 10-day moving average for BEN crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on November 09, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 10 of 15 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 27, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BEN as a result. In 53 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 60%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BEN just turned positive on October 27, 2026. Looking at past instances where BEN's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 29 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.

BEN moved above its 50-day moving average on November 06, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.

Following a +1.20% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where BEN advanced for three days, in 200 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 63%.

Bearish Trend Analysis

The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.

The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 9 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where BEN declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 71%.

BEN broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 06, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.

The Aroon Indicator for BEN entered a downward trend on October 26, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 12 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. BEN’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 49 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock slightly better than average.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 80 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.460) is normal, around the industry mean (2.412). P/E Ratio (22.946) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-2.386). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.407) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.039) settles around the average of (0.270) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.814) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

A.I.Advisor
a Summary for STT with price predictions
Nov 11, 2026

STT's RSI Indicator ascends from oversold territory

The RSI Oscillator for STT moved out of oversold territory on October 21, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 17 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 15 of the 17 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 88%.

Price Prediction Chart

Technical Analysis (Indicators)

Bullish Trend Analysis

The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 41 of 54 cases where STT's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on November 09, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on STT as a result. In 54 of 71 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.

The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for STT just turned positive on October 26, 2026. Looking at past instances where STT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 39 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.

Following a +1.93% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where STT advanced for three days, in 240 of 366 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 66%.

STT may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.

Bearish Trend Analysis

Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where STT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 55%.

The Aroon Indicator for STT entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.

Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)

The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 8 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.

The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 11 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 80, placing this stock better than average.

The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 28 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 47 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. STT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.

The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.

The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 83 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.841) is normal, around the industry mean (2.412). P/E Ratio (14.372) is within average values for comparable stocks, (-2.386). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.671) is also within normal values, averaging (1.319). Dividend Yield (0.022) settles around the average of (0.270) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (3.453) is also within normal values, averaging (15.694).

FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEN vs STT: Fundamental Ratings
BEN
STT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2323
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4911
SMR RATING
1..100
808
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5528
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEN's Valuation (80) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as STT (83) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to STT’s over the last 12 months.

STT's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (49) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

STT's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BEN (80) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew significantly faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's Price Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STT (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than STT’s over the last 12 months.

STT's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BEN (55) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that STT’s stock grew similarly to BEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BENSTT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 12, 2026
Stock price -- (BEN: $36.29 vs. STT: $171.62)
Brand notoriety: BEN and STT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEN: 96% vs. STT: 69%
Market capitalization -- BEN: $17.14B vs. STT: $45.48B
BEN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.14B. STT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $45.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $1.6 to $182.57B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while STT’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BEN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STT’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the long-term than BEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STT is a better buy in the short-term than BEN.

Price Growth

BEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а +12.14% price change this week, while STT (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

BEN is expected to report earnings on Feb 01, 2027.

STT is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2027.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.64% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEN has been loosely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BEN jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEN
1D Price
Change %
BEN100%
+0.03%
IVZ - BEN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
CG - BEN
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
PFG - BEN
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
BAM - BEN
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.74%
BN - BEN
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
More

STT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STT has been closely correlated with NTRS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STT jumps, then NTRS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STT
1D Price
Change %
STT100%
+1.49%
NTRS - STT
72%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
IVZ - STT
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
BEN - STT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
AMP - STT
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.02%
BLK - STT
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
More
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VRCA3.910.39
+11.08%
Verrica Pharmaceuticals Inc
CNXC32.760.80
+2.49%
Concentrix Corp
CDRO8.680.12
+1.34%
Codere Online Luxembourg SA
OCCIM25.040.02
+0.08%
OFS Credit Company Inc
ESTC87.310.06
+0.07%
Elastic NV