Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFIV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BL (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.24% price change this week, while FFIV (@Packaged Software) price change was +1.44% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.58%.
BL is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2024.
FFIV is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2024.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BL | FFIV | BL / FFIV | |
Capitalization | 3.99B | 11.2B | 36% |
EBITDA | 117M | 725M | 16% |
Gain YTD | -3.459 | 1.760 | -197% |
P/E Ratio | 78.96 | 24.75 | 319% |
Revenue | 590M | 2.81B | 21% |
Total Cash | 1.2B | 826M | 146% |
Total Debt | 1.41B | 276M | 511% |
BL | FFIV | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 81 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 54 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 60 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFIV's Valuation (66) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as BL (85) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FFIV (81) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
BL's SMR Rating (36) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as FFIV (54) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that BL’s stock grew similarly to FFIV’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as BL (52) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew similarly to BL’s over the last 12 months.
FFIV's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Computer Communications industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BL (97) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that FFIV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BL’s over the last 12 months.
BL | FFIV | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago65% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago61% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago60% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago71% | 2 days ago62% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago72% | 12 days ago62% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago63% | 2 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ROYA | 26.66 | 0.12 | +0.47% |
Tema Global Royalties ETF | |||
IBDU | 22.43 | 0.06 | +0.27% |
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Corp ETF | |||
CBON | 21.87 | 0.02 | +0.09% |
VanEck China Bond ETF | |||
UOCT | 33.56 | 0.03 | +0.09% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buf ETF™ Oct | |||
DAUG | 36.94 | N/A | N/A |
FT Cboe Vest US Equity Deep Bfr ETF Aug |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIV has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFIV jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FFIV | 100% | +0.10% | ||
CLSK - FFIV | 52% Loosely correlated | -5.77% | ||
COIN - FFIV | 49% Loosely correlated | -7.68% | ||
PTC - FFIV | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
RIOT - FFIV | 48% Loosely correlated | -7.12% | ||
INTU - FFIV | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
More |