BUJA vs SPCZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUJA is a Buy and SPCZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUJA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BUJA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
BUJA (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.49%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+0.60% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| SPCZ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 17% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 16% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 29% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 21% |
BUJA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUJA has been loosely correlated with PRLHU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUJA jumps, then PRLHU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUJA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUJA | 100% | N/A | ||
| PRLHU - BUJA | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AEAEU - BUJA | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EVGR - BUJA | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.09% | ||
| RRAC - BUJA | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
| INTEU - BUJA | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SPCZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SPCZ and ACAC have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPCZ and ACAC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SPCZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPCZ | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| ACAC - SPCZ | 9% Poorly correlated | -1.54% | ||
| AACT - SPCZ | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BUJA - SPCZ | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AEAE - SPCZ | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JWSM - SPCZ | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||