CCBG
Price
$34.78
Change
+$0.42 (+1.22%)
Updated
Sep 16, 03:00 PM (EDT)
36 days until earnings call
FRAF
Price
$32.42
Change
+$0.41 (+1.28%)
Updated
Sep 16, 01:52 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

CCBG vs FRAF

Header iconCCBG vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts CCBG vs FRAFBanner chart's image
Capital City Bank Group
Price$34.78
Change+$0.42 (+1.22%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Franklin Financial Services
Price$32.42
Change+$0.41 (+1.28%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CCBG vs FRAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
CCBG vs. FRAF commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCBG is a StrongBuy and FRAF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (CCBG: $34.36 vs. FRAF: $32.01)
Brand notoriety: CCBG and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CCBG: 91% vs. FRAF: 24%
Market capitalization -- CCBG: $469.33M vs. FRAF: $113.45M
CCBG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $469.33M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CCBG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CCBG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both CCBG and FRAF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CCBG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CCBG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CCBG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.35% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

CCBG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2024.

FRAF is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCBG($469M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($113M). CCBG has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: CCBG (8.96) vs FRAF (8.33). CCBG YTD gains are higher at: 19.359 vs. FRAF (4.537). CCBG has more cash in the bank: 72.4M vs. FRAF (20.1M). CCBG has less debt than FRAF: CCBG (61.6M) vs FRAF (154M). CCBG has higher revenues than FRAF: CCBG (224M) vs FRAF (67.3M).
CCBGFRAFCCBG / FRAF
Capitalization469M113M415%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD19.3594.537427%
P/E Ratio8.968.33108%
Revenue224M67.3M333%
Total Cash72.4M20.1M360%
Total Debt61.6M154M40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CCBG vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
CCBG
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9342
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3262
SMR RATING
1..100
2343
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4044
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCBG (64). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CCBG’s over the last 12 months.

CCBG's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (62). This means that CCBG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

CCBG's SMR Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (43). This means that CCBG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

CCBG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (44). This means that CCBG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCBG (41). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to CCBG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CCBG
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CCBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLCRX6.260.05
+0.81%
Voya Large Cap Value Port R6
MITBX37.400.18
+0.48%
MFS Massachusetts Investors Tr B
MGFAX10.440.04
+0.38%
MassMutual Global A
MRBPX23.840.09
+0.38%
BlackRock Sustainable Balanced R
MFMLX16.090.01
+0.06%
Morgan Stanley Inst Next Gen Em Mkts L

CCBG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CCBG has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CCBG jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCBG
1D Price
Change %
CCBG100%
+2.41%
SFNC - CCBG
77%
Closely correlated
+3.46%
BUSE - CCBG
77%
Closely correlated
+2.13%
QCRH - CCBG
76%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
FMNB - CCBG
76%
Closely correlated
+2.30%
TMP - CCBG
75%
Closely correlated
+3.39%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with CHMG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then CHMG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-0.77%
CHMG - FRAF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
FCCO - FRAF
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.96%
FCBC - FRAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+3.39%
BWFG - FRAF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
CCBG - FRAF
32%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
More