Ad is loading...
CCGSX vs NPFFX
CCGSX vs NPFFX Comparison
Open Charts CCGSX vs NPFFX
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth I
Price$22.85
Change-$0.46 (-1.97%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New Perspective F1
Price$61.19
Change-$1.07 (-1.72%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCGSX vs NPFFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CCGSX vs. NPFFX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCGSX is a Buy and NPFFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPFFX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. CCGSX (359M). NPFFX pays higher dividends than CCGSX: NPFFX (0.79) vs CCGSX (0.16). CCGSX was incepted earlier than NPFFX: CCGSX (8 years) vs NPFFX (24 years). NPFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. CCGSX (14.00). NPFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCGSX: NPFFX (250) vs CCGSX (2500). CCGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.17 vs. NPFFX (14.81). CCGSX return over 5 years is better than : 74.76 vs. NPFFX (40.71).
| CCGSX | NPFFX | CCGSX / NPFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.041 | 12.241 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 359M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.79 | 20% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.17 | 14.81 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.10 | -9.96 | -21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.76 | 40.71 | 184% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 63.25 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...