Ad is loading...
CGFAX vs NLCCX
CGFAX vs NLCCX Comparison
Open Charts CGFAX vs NLCCX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$70.29
Change-$1.52 (-2.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$29.50
Change-$0.71 (-2.35%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CGFAX vs NLCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
CGFAX vs. NLCCX commentary
Sep 07, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CGFAX is a Buy and NLCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. NLCCX (705M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: CGFAX (0.47) vs NLCCX (0.00). CGFAX was incepted earlier than NLCCX: CGFAX (23 years) vs NLCCX (27 years). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. CGFAX (31.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: CGFAX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). NLCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.95 vs. CGFAX (18.27). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 47.94 vs. NLCCX (-13.64).
| CGFAX | NLCCX | CGFAX / NLCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.562 | 17.276 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270B | 705M | 38,298% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.27 | 25.95 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.20 | -34.86 | 21% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.94 | -13.64 | -352% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.46 | -2.36 | -2,599% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...