Advertisement
CHKP vs TENB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) vs. Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- CHKP, a cybersecurity leader, offers stability with a profitable model and recent $2 billion share buyback, contrasting TENB's growth-focused but loss-making profile.
- Recent market activity shows TENB gaining momentum with about 17% monthly upside from product launches, while CHKP has faced pressure, down roughly 7% over similar periods.
- CHKP trades at a reasonable price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of around 14, indicating potential undervaluation, versus TENB's elevated multiples amid ongoing investments.
- Both stocks operate in cybersecurity but differ in scale: CHKP's $14.4 billion market cap dwarfs TENB's $2.4 billion, reflecting maturity versus agility.
- Year-to-date declines position both as relative underperformers, but CHKP shows resilience through consistent revenue growth around 6%.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight diverse strategies, potentially favoring CHKP for trend consistency in volatile conditions.
Introduction
In the competitive cybersecurity sector, CHKP and TENB represent distinct approaches: established network security versus innovative exposure management. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning to aid traders seeking momentum plays and investors prioritizing stability. With cybersecurity threats escalating, understanding relative strengths helps evaluate opportunities in a market favoring resilient players amid broader tech sector rotations.
CHKP Overview and Recent Performance
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (CHKP) develops comprehensive IT security solutions, including firewalls, cloud security, and AI-powered threat management for enterprises worldwide. Headquartered in Israel, it serves a global clientele through multilayered defenses against network and endpoint threats.
Recent market activity has seen CHKP under pressure, with shares declining around 7% in the past month amid broader sector weakness. Year-to-date, the stock is down approximately 25%, trading near its 52-week low of $131 from a high of $234. Influences include a post-earnings pullback despite solid Q4 results—revenue up 6% year-over-year to $745 million—and a $2 billion buyback announcement alongside AI security initiatives. Sentiment reflects concerns over growth deceleration, though deferred revenues rose 9%, signaling backlog strength. Trading volume averages over 1 million shares, with a P/E ratio of 14 underscoring value relative to peers.
TENB Overview and Recent Performance
Tenable Holdings, Inc. (TENB) specializes in cyber exposure management, offering platforms like Tenable Vulnerability Management and OT Security to identify and prioritize risks across cloud, identity, and operational technology environments. Based in Maryland, it targets organizations navigating complex attack surfaces.
In recent weeks, TENB has shown resilience, posting about 17% gains over the past month, rebounding from year-to-date losses near 15%. Shares hover around $20, within a 52-week range of $16 to $36. Key drivers include product expansions like an advanced OT asset discovery engine and enhanced exposure management for cyber-physical systems, boosting visibility in industrial security. Q4 revenue grew 10.5% to $261 million, though profitability remains elusive. Elevated volume exceeding 2.5 million shares reflects heightened trader interest amid upcoming Q1 earnings.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, curating 25 elite models from a library of 351 that analyze thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ varied approaches—short-term scalping, swing trading, or long-term trend following—with performance metrics often featuring win rates above 60%, profit factors exceeding 1.5, and average returns ranging from 20-50% annually, based on backtested and live results. Selected for current market conditions like volatility in tech and cybersecurity, they adapt to momentum shifts and risk parameters. Traders can explore these ready-to-deploy tools to enhance decision-making without manual oversight. Visit the Trending AI Robots page for detailed stats and subscription options.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CHKP and TENB both thrive in cybersecurity but diverge in business models: CHKP's mature, integrated platform drives steady billings and profitability, while TENB emphasizes subscription-based exposure tools for rapid scalability.
Growth drivers contrast sharply—CHKP leverages buybacks and AI enhancements for efficiency, versus TENB's innovation in OT and cloud security amid rising industrial digitization. Recent momentum favors TENB short-term, but CHKP exhibits lower volatility.
Risk factors include CHKP's slower growth exposing it to M&A (mergers and acquisitions) threats, and TENB's cash burn heightening dilution risks. Sector exposure overlaps in enterprise cyber defense, yet TENB gains from OT/IoT trends. Market sentiment tilts toward CHKP for value, TENB for upside potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward CHKP, citing its trend consistency, undervalued P/E, robust backlog, and buyback support as probabilistic edges in uncertain markets. While TENB offers momentum from product catalysts, its volatility and lack of profits temper near-term favorability. AI models prioritize relative stability for sustained positioning.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CHKP is a StrongBuy and TENB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CHKP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTENB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CHKP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TENB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CHKP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TENB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CHKP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TENB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
CHKP (@Computer Communications) experienced а +6.86% price change this week, while TENB (@Computer Communications) price change was +19.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +7.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +25.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
CHKP is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
TENB is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Computer Communications (+7.42% weekly)Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.
| CHKP | TENB | CHKP / TENB | |
| Capitalization | 14.6B | 3.41B | 428% |
| EBITDA | 1.03B | 71.6M | 1,432% |
| Gain YTD | -24.515 | 31.343 | -78% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.41 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.76B | 1.02B | 270% |
| Total Cash | 2.77B | 360M | 769% |
| Total Debt | 1.97B | 419M | 471% |
CHKP | TENB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 43 Fair valued | 57 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CHKP's Valuation (43) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as TENB (57) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's SMR Rating (25) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for TENB (93) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew significantly faster than TENB’s over the last 12 months.
TENB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as CHKP (59) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that TENB’s stock grew similarly to CHKP’s over the last 12 months.
CHKP's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as TENB (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that CHKP’s stock grew similarly to TENB’s over the last 12 months.
| CHKP | TENB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 48% | 21 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 64% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KNO | 63.97 | 0.51 | +0.81% |
| AXS Knowledge Leaders ETF | |||
| DJD | 63.28 | 0.29 | +0.46% |
| Invesco Dow Jones Industrial Avg Div ETF | |||
| MARW | 36.11 | 0.01 | +0.02% |
| AllianzIM US Equity Buffer20 Mar ETF | |||
| JPLD | 52.01 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Limited Duration Bond ETF | |||
| TKNQ | 23.53 | N/A | N/A |
| Amplify Tokenization Technology ETF | |||
CHKP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CHKP has been loosely correlated with PANW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CHKP jumps, then PANW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHKP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHKP | 100% | +0.73% | ||
| PANW - CHKP | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| TENB - CHKP | 43% Loosely correlated | +5.41% | ||
| OKTA - CHKP | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| RDWR - CHKP | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| S - CHKP | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
More | ||||
TENB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TENB has been loosely correlated with OKTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TENB jumps, then OKTA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TENB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TENB | 100% | +5.41% | ||
| OKTA - TENB | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.20% | ||
| CRWD - TENB | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.69% | ||
| QLYS - TENB | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| RPD - TENB | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| GTLB - TENB | 57% Loosely correlated | -5.83% | ||
More | ||||