CLS
Price
$334.75
Change
-$0.75 (-0.22%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
38.38B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FN
Price
$517.73
Change
+$4.06 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
18.55B
31 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CLS vs FN

CLS vs FN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CLS vs. FN commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLS is a Hold and FN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CLS: $334.75 vs. FN: $517.73)
Brand notoriety: CLS and FN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CLS: 111% vs. FN: 41%
Market capitalization -- CLS: $38.38B vs. FN: $18.55B
CLS [@Electronic Components] is valued at $38.38B. FN’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $18.55B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $193.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $13.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CLS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the long-term than CLS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FN is a better buy in the short-term than CLS.

Price Growth

CLS (@Electronic Components) experienced а +10.17% price change this week, while FN (@Electronic Components) price change was +12.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

CLS is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

FN is expected to report earnings on Aug 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+3.05% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLS($38.4B) has a higher market cap than FN($18.6B). FN has higher P/E ratio than CLS: FN (44.48) vs CLS (40.58). FN (13.717) and CLS (13.240) have similar YTD gains . CLS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.36B vs. FN (510M). FN has more cash in the bank: 945M vs. CLS (378M). FN has less debt than CLS: FN (4.43M) vs CLS (772M). CLS has higher revenues than FN: CLS (13.8B) vs FN (4.24B).
CLSFNCLS / FN
Capitalization38.4B18.6B206%
EBITDA1.36B510M266%
Gain YTD13.24013.71797%
P/E Ratio40.5844.4891%
Revenue13.8B4.24B326%
Total Cash378M945M40%
Total Debt772M4.43M17,446%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CLS vs FN: Fundamental Ratings
CLS
FN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6413
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2534
SMR RATING
1..100
1945
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4659
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6424
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FN's Valuation (59) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (72). This means that FN’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (34). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (45). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as FN (59). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to FN’s over the last 12 months.

FN's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (64). This means that FN’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLSFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CLS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EAF7.100.29
+4.26%
GrafTech International Ltd
VNRX1.080.04
+3.85%
VolitionRX Limited
VTR97.920.74
+0.76%
Ventas
BBSI39.790.29
+0.73%
Barrett Business Services Inc.
VCYT57.88-0.13
-0.22%
Veracyte

CLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLS has been closely correlated with FN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLS jumps, then FN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLS
1D Price
Change %
CLS100%
-0.22%
FN - CLS
67%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
TTMI - CLS
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
GLW - CLS
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
FLEX - CLS
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
BHE - CLS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.41%
More