CMDRF vs MARVF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CMDRF is a Hold and MARVF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CMDRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMARVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CMDRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MARVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
CMDRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MARVF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.46% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| CMDRF | MARVF | CMDRF / MARVF | |
| Capitalization | 2.42M | 4.04M | 60% |
| EBITDA | -807.35K | -818.79K | 99% |
| Gain YTD | -27.119 | -56.379 | 48% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 784K | 809K | 97% |
| Total Debt | 46.3K | 191K | 24% |
CMDRF | MARVF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 95 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MARVF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMDRF (88). This means that MARVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMDRF’s over the last 12 months.
MARVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CMDRF (100). This means that MARVF’s stock grew similarly to CMDRF’s over the last 12 months.
CMDRF's SMR Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as MARVF (95). This means that CMDRF’s stock grew similarly to MARVF’s over the last 12 months.
CMDRF's Price Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as MARVF (95). This means that CMDRF’s stock grew similarly to MARVF’s over the last 12 months.
CMDRF's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MARVF (100). This means that CMDRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MARVF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
CMDRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CMDRF has been loosely correlated with NICOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CMDRF jumps, then NICOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CMDRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CMDRF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NICOF - CMDRF | 59% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BLIDF - CMDRF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SLTFF - CMDRF | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.23% | ||
| MARVF - CMDRF | 21% Poorly correlated | +23.41% | ||
| CRUCF - CMDRF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
MARVF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that MARVF and TCEFF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MARVF and TCEFF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MARVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARVF | 100% | +23.41% | ||
| TCEFF - MARVF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DAUGF - MARVF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| USAS - MARVF | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.33% | ||
| CMDRF - MARVF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| EMX - MARVF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||