CW
Price
$724.00
Change
+$7.34 (+1.02%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
26.75B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DCO
Price
$179.02
Change
-$4.41 (-2.40%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
2.7B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CW vs DCO

CW vs DCO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) vs. Ducommun Incorporated (DCO) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Curtiss-Wright (CW) is a diversified $27.5 billion aerospace and defense giant with record 2025 revenue of $3.5 billion, while Ducommun (DCO) is a $2.8 billion specialized engineering and manufacturing firm targeting $950 million to $1 billion in revenue under its VISION 2027 plan.
  • CW delivered 21% adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) growth in 2025, compared to DCO's adjusted net income growth of 2% in its most recent quarter, though DCO's top-line momentum in defense is accelerating.
  • DCO posted a year-to-date return of approximately 87% as of late July 2026, sharply outpacing CW's roughly 35% over the same period, reflecting stronger percentage gains from a smaller base.
  • Both companies benefit from secular defense spending trends, but CW also has meaningful exposure to commercial nuclear power, while DCO is navigating commercial aerospace destocking headwinds.
  • CW's $4.1 billion backlog and 1.2x book-to-bill ratio signal sustained demand, whereas DCO's 1.6x book-to-bill ratio and record remaining performance obligations (RPO) suggest faster relative order momentum.

Introduction

Investors scanning the aerospace and defense sector often encounter two companies that, while operating in overlapping end markets, differ markedly in scale, strategy, and recent market behavior. CW (Curtiss-Wright Corporation) and DCO (Ducommun Incorporated) each supply critical components to military and commercial aerospace programs, yet their stock performances and underlying financial profiles have diverged in notable ways. For traders and long-term investors seeking exposure to defense industrials, understanding how these two names compare across dimensions such as revenue scale, margin trajectory, order momentum, and relative valuation can provide useful context when evaluating portfolio positioning in the current market environment.

CW Overview and Recent Performance

Curtiss-Wright Corporation operates across three segments: Aerospace & Industrial, Defense Electronics, and Naval & Power. The company supplies engineered products and services to aerospace, defense, commercial nuclear power, and general industrial markets worldwide. In recent weeks, CW shares have traded near the $740–$760 range, having pulled back modestly from an all-time closing high of $792.77 reached in early July 2026. The stock has delivered a year-to-date gain of approximately 35%, building on a 56% rise in 2025.

Fundamentally, CW reported record full-year 2025 sales of $3.5 billion, representing 12% growth, with adjusted diluted EPS of $13.23, up 21%. The company generated free cash flow (FCF) of $554 million, achieving 111% FCF conversion. Its backlog reached $4.1 billion, up 18% year-over-year, supported by a book-to-bill ratio of 1.2x. Management's 2026 outlook calls for organic sales growth of 6% to 8%, operating margin expansion to a range of 18.9% to 19.2%, and double-digit EPS growth. The "Pivot to Growth" strategy has resonated with the market, as CW's alignment with naval defense programs and commercial nuclear power has provided multiple demand catalysts.

DCO Overview and Recent Performance

Ducommun Incorporated provides engineering and manufacturing services through two segments: Electronic Systems and Structural Systems. The company supplies complex components and assemblies for commercial and military aircraft, missile systems, space programs, and industrial applications. In recent weeks, DCO shares have traded in the $160–$190 range, with the stock recently closing at approximately $184. The company's year-to-date return stands at roughly 87%, following a 49% gain in 2025, making it one of the stronger performers in the mid-cap aerospace supplier space.

DCO's most recent quarterly results showed record revenue of $212.6 million, up 6% year-over-year, and record gross margins of 26.6%. However, a $99.7 million litigation settlement produced a reported net loss. On an adjusted basis, the company posted net income of $15.2 million, or $0.99 per diluted share, and an adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margin of 16.2% — both records. Defense revenue growth, particularly from missile programs and military rotorcraft, offset ongoing weakness in commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturer (OEM) demand. DCO's book-to-bill ratio reached 1.6x, and remaining performance obligations hit a new record, signaling robust future demand. The company remains on track toward its VISION 2027 targets of $950 million to $1 billion in revenue and an 18% adjusted EBITDA margin.

Trending AI Robots

For traders who prefer a data-driven approach to stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's best-performing AI trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered virtual agents that trade thousands of different tickers, each employing distinct strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters. The bots featured in the Trending section represent those currently best suited to prevailing market conditions. Performance metrics vary widely — some bots have demonstrated annualized returns exceeding 100%, while others focus on consistency with win rates above 70% and profit factors exceeding 4.0. Strategies range from 5-minute intraday scalping to multi-week swing trading, covering both long and short positions across equities and ETFs. Explore the Trending AI Robots page to see which automated strategies are currently capturing market opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

CW and DCO differ most starkly in scale: CW's $27.5 billion market capitalization and $3.5 billion in annual revenue dwarf DCO's $2.8 billion market cap and roughly $840 million in trailing twelve-month sales. CW's diversified revenue base — spanning naval propulsion, defense electronics, commercial aerospace, and nuclear power — contrasts with DCO's more concentrated exposure to aerospace structures and electronic subsystems. This diversification gives CW a smoother earnings profile, while DCO's narrower focus can produce sharper upside when defense demand surges.

On profitability, CW's adjusted operating margin of 18.6% in 2025 exceeds DCO's adjusted operating margin of approximately 10.6%. However, DCO's margin trajectory is steepening, with adjusted EBITDA margins climbing from 15.8% to 16.2% year-over-year. The litigation overhang at DCO — which produced a GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net loss — adds a layer of event risk not present at CW.

From a momentum perspective, DCO's 1.6x book-to-bill ratio and 87% year-to-date stock gain reflect powerful near-term order flow and sentiment, while CW's steadier 1.2x ratio and 35% year-to-date return suggest a more mature, less volatile growth profile. Both companies benefit from rising global defense budgets and reshoring tailwinds, but CW's nuclear exposure and DCO's commercial aerospace recovery narrative represent differentiated catalysts.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, stability of earnings, and breadth of demand catalysts, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely tilt in favor of CW for investors prioritizing earnings visibility and margin resilience. CW's record backlog, diversified end markets, consistent free cash flow generation, and clear 2026 guidance trajectory present a more predictable fundamental picture. That said, DCO might be favored by momentum-oriented strategies given its stronger book-to-bill ratio, faster year-to-date price appreciation, and the potential upside from commercial aerospace recovery. The AI's preference ultimately depends on the weighting assigned to stability versus momentum in any given market regime — in a risk-on environment, DCO's higher beta and smaller base could attract greater relative interest, while CW's steadier compound growth profile may prove more durable through volatility.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CW vs. DCO commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CW is a Buy and DCO is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (CW: $724.00 vs. DCO: $179.02)
Brand notoriety: CW and DCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CW: 43% vs. DCO: 80%
Market capitalization -- CW: $26.75B vs. DCO: $2.7B
CW [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $26.75B. DCO’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $2.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $1.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $37.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CW is a better buy in the long-term than DCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • DCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CW is a better buy in the short-term than DCO.

Price Growth

CW (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -3.49% price change this week, while DCO (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was +0.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was +5.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

CW is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

DCO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (+5.98% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CW($26.7B) has a higher market cap than DCO($2.7B). CW has higher P/E ratio than DCO: CW (53.04) vs DCO (34.66). DCO YTD gains are higher at: 88.185 vs. CW (31.423). CW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 818M vs. DCO (12.9M). DCO has less debt than CW: DCO (343M) vs CW (1.15B). CW has higher revenues than DCO: CW (3.61B) vs DCO (841M).
CWDCOCW / DCO
Capitalization26.7B2.7B989%
EBITDA818M12.9M6,341%
Gain YTD31.42388.18536%
P/E Ratio53.0434.66153%
Revenue3.61B841M429%
Total CashN/A39.1M-
Total Debt1.15B343M335%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CW vs DCO: Fundamental Ratings
CW
DCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1663
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23
SMR RATING
1..100
4693
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4737
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3067
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CW's Valuation (67) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as DCO (82). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to DCO’s over the last 12 months.

CW's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as DCO (3). This means that CW’s stock grew similarly to DCO’s over the last 12 months.

CW's SMR Rating (46) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCO (93). This means that CW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCO’s over the last 12 months.

DCO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is in the same range as CW (47). This means that DCO’s stock grew similarly to CW’s over the last 12 months.

CW's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Aerospace And Defense industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DCO (67). This means that CW’s stock grew somewhat faster than DCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWDCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NJAN58.550.27
+0.46%
Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
BAMB25.74-0.06
-0.22%
Brookstone Intermediate Bond ETF
BSVO29.27-0.07
-0.25%
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
TRBF48.53-0.17
-0.34%
Angel Oak Total Return ETF
MUU23.67-3.30
-12.24%
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares

CW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CW has been closely correlated with BWXT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CW jumps, then BWXT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CW
1D Price
Change %
CW100%
+1.02%
BWXT - CW
76%
Closely correlated
+1.88%
HWM - CW
66%
Closely correlated
+1.80%
DCO - CW
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.40%
ATRO - CW
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
WWD - CW
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
More

DCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DCO has been loosely correlated with AIR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DCO jumps, then AIR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCO
1D Price
Change %
DCO100%
-2.40%
AIR - DCO
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
CW - DCO
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
PKE - DCO
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.04%
HEI - DCO
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.62%
LOAR - DCO
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
More