CYNXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 20 closing price
MXTLF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 2 closing price
Ad is loading...

CYNXF vs MXTLF

Header iconCYNXF vs MXTLF Comparison
Open Charts CYNXF vs MXTLFBanner chart's image
INTERNATIONAL METALS MNG
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20K
CapitalizationN/A
Metalex Ventures
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$280
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
CYNXF vs MXTLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
CYNXF vs. MXTLF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CYNXF is a Hold and MXTLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CYNXF: $0.03 vs. MXTLF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: CYNXF and MXTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CYNXF: 140% vs. MXTLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- CYNXF: $716.51K vs. MXTLF: $5.92M
CYNXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $716.51K. MXTLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.92M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CYNXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMXTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CYNXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MXTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MXTLF is a better buy in the long-term than CYNXF.

Price Growth

CYNXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MXTLF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.12% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MXTLF($5.92M) has a higher market cap than CYNXF($717K). MXTLF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. CYNXF (-67.405). MXTLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.32M vs. CYNXF (-4.19M). MXTLF has more cash in the bank: 2.48M vs. CYNXF (15.1K). MXTLF has less debt than CYNXF: MXTLF (0) vs CYNXF (46K). CYNXF (0) and MXTLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CYNXFMXTLFCYNXF / MXTLF
Capitalization717K5.92M12%
EBITDA-4.19M-1.32M317%
Gain YTD-67.4050.000-
P/E RatioN/A5.81-
Revenue00-
Total Cash15.1K2.48M1%
Total Debt46K0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MXTLF: Fundamental Ratings
MXTLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
29
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
66
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

CYNXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYNXF has been loosely correlated with MXTLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYNXF jumps, then MXTLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYNXF
1D Price
Change %
CYNXF100%
N/A
MXTLF - CYNXF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LNCLF - CYNXF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DNGDF - CYNXF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
BDLNF - CYNXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.49%
CJIMF - CYNXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MXTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MXTLF has been loosely correlated with BDLNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MXTLF jumps, then BDLNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MXTLF
1D Price
Change %
MXTLF100%
N/A
BDLNF - MXTLF
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.49%
CJIMF - MXTLF
60%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ERYTF - MXTLF
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.02%
ZMPLF - MXTLF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CYNXF - MXTLF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More