DAC
Price
$125.95
Change
-$0.71 (-0.56%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.29B
51 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GSL
Price
$37.89
Change
-$0.09 (-0.24%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
41 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DAC vs GSL

DAC vs GSL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Danaos Corporation (DAC) vs. Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Danaos Corporation (DAC) and Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) both operate in the marine shipping sector as containership owners and lessors with long-term charter contracts providing revenue visibility.
  • In recent market activity, DAC has shown stronger year-to-date gains near 38% alongside solid Q1 2026 earnings that highlighted dry-bulk improvements offsetting container softness.
  • GSL trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio around 3.6x with a higher dividend yield near 6%, supported by consistent quarterly payouts and upcoming Q1 2026 results.
  • Both companies maintain contracted revenue backlogs and fleet expansion plans, though DAC benefits from a larger market capitalization and recent vessel orders backed by multi-year charters.
  • Relative performance reflects sector tailwinds from stable charter rates, with DAC exhibiting slightly higher recent momentum while GSL offers greater income focus through dividends.
  • Market sentiment remains constructive for both amid broader shipping industry stability, with no single dominant catalyst differentiating the pair in the past several weeks.

Introduction

Traders and investors often compare DAC and GSL because both companies lease containerships to major global carriers under long-term contracts, offering exposure to maritime trade without direct operational risks. This analysis appeals to those seeking income-generating shipping plays, value-oriented portfolios, or sector diversification within industrials. The comparison highlights differences in scale, valuation, dividend profiles, and recent earnings trends to clarify relative positioning in the current environment.

DAC Overview and Recent Performance

Danaos Corporation (DAC) owns and charters a fleet focused primarily on containerships, with a growing dry-bulk presence. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near its 52-week high around $135, delivering year-to-date gains near 38% amid steady charter revenues. Q1 2026 results showed adjusted earnings per share of $6.72 and net income of $122.5 million, supported by improved dry-bulk earnings per day. Fleet expansion includes new vessels scheduled for 2027-2028 with secured charters, reinforcing revenue visibility. Sentiment has remained positive due to operational stability and cost controls despite softer container rates in parts of the market.

GSL Overview and Recent Performance

Global Ship Lease, Inc. (GSL) specializes in owning and leasing mid-sized containerships under multi-year contracts. In recent market activity, shares have hovered near $41 with a 52-week range of $23.95 to $42.70, reflecting solid annual gains and consistent dividend distributions. The company declared a $0.625 per share quarterly dividend for Q1 2026 payable in June, underscoring cash-flow reliability. Q4 2025 earnings beat expectations, and the upcoming Q1 2026 report scheduled for May 22 provides further insight into operations. Sentiment has stayed supportive, driven by a sizable contracted revenue backlog and disciplined capital returns in a stable charter environment.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available across the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and risk parameters, with performance statistics that can range widely depending on market conditions and asset class. Only the most suitable and top-ranked bots for prevailing trends earn placement in this section, highlighting metrics such as win rates, average returns per trade, and drawdown controls. All bots differ in their approaches—from short-term momentum to longer-term trend following—allowing users to match tools to specific objectives. Explore the full lineup on the Trending AI Robots page for detailed statistics and live performance data.

Head-to-Head Comparison

DAC operates at larger scale with a market capitalization near $2.4 billion compared to GSL’s approximately $1.5 billion, giving it broader fleet diversity that includes emerging dry-bulk exposure. Growth drivers for DAC center on recent vessel deliveries and charter-backed expansion, while GSL emphasizes steady income through a higher dividend yield and lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio near 3.6x versus DAC’s more moderate valuation. Recent momentum favors DAC following its Q1 earnings release, though both stocks benefit from similar sector exposure to containership leasing and long-term contract stability. Risk factors include charter rate fluctuations and fuel costs, with GSL potentially offering lower volatility through its focused mid-size fleet and capital-return policy. Overall, DAC provides scale and earnings momentum trade-offs, while GSL delivers higher current income and value characteristics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, trend stability near highs, and fleet expansion catalysts, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a modest probabilistic edge to DAC for its stronger year-to-date momentum and diversified revenue streams. GSL remains competitive due to its attractive yield and lower valuation multiples, potentially appealing in income-focused scenarios. The assessment reflects relative positioning rather than certainty, as both stocks operate in a comparable market environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
DAC vs. GSL commentary
Jun 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DAC is a Hold and GSL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 20, 2026
Stock price -- (DAC: $126.66 vs. GSL: $37.98)
Brand notoriety: DAC and GSL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Marine Shipping industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DAC: 102% vs. GSL: 78%
Market capitalization -- DAC: $2.29B vs. GSL: $1.37B
DAC [@Marine Shipping] is valued at $2.29B. GSL’s [@Marine Shipping] market capitalization is $1.37B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Marine Shipping] industry ranges from $32.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Marine Shipping] industry is $1.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DAC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileGSL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • DAC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • GSL’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSL is a better buy in the long-term than DAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DAC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GSL’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DAC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GSL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DAC is a better buy in the short-term than GSL.

Price Growth

DAC (@Marine Shipping) experienced а -1.51% price change this week, while GSL (@Marine Shipping) price change was -0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Marine Shipping industry was -3.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

DAC is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.

GSL is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Marine Shipping (-3.26% weekly)

The marine shipping industry provides passenger transportation or cargo shipping services via waterways. This industry includes freight towage, ferry services and warehousing on deep-sea and inland waterways. The aviation sector may have reduced the popularity of sea travel for several passengers, but it is still in demand for short trips and pleasure cruises. Teekay Offshore Partners L.P. Cum Red Perp Pfd., Kirby Corporation and Seaspan Corporation are some of the well-known names in the business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DAC($2.29B) has a higher market cap than GSL($1.37B). DAC has higher P/E ratio than GSL: DAC (4.45) vs GSL (3.62). DAC YTD gains are higher at: 35.770 vs. GSL (11.841). DAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 729M vs. GSL (548M). DAC has more cash in the bank: 1.02B vs. GSL (499M). GSL has less debt than DAC: GSL (653M) vs DAC (1.03B). DAC has higher revenues than GSL: DAC (1.04B) vs GSL (757M).
DACGSLDAC / GSL
Capitalization2.29B1.37B168%
EBITDA729M548M133%
Gain YTD35.77011.841302%
P/E Ratio4.453.62123%
Revenue1.04B757M138%
Total Cash1.02B499M204%
Total Debt1.03B653M157%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DAC vs GSL: Fundamental Ratings
DAC
GSL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
752
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2916
SMR RATING
1..100
6143
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3124
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSL's Valuation (6) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as DAC (18) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew similarly to DAC’s over the last 12 months.

GSL's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as DAC (29) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew similarly to DAC’s over the last 12 months.

GSL's SMR Rating (43) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as DAC (61) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew similarly to DAC’s over the last 12 months.

DAC's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as GSL (49) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that DAC’s stock grew similarly to GSL’s over the last 12 months.

GSL's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as DAC (31) in the Marine Shipping industry. This means that GSL’s stock grew similarly to DAC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DACGSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMSF43.031.65
+3.98%
Matthews Emerging Markets Sus Fut ActETF
IBGA24.460.11
+0.47%
iShares iBonds Dec 2044 Term Trsy ETF
ACV28.190.07
+0.25%
Virtus Diversified Income & Convertible Fund
CTWO17.27N/A
N/A
COtwo Advs Physical Eur Carb AllowanceTr
DSTL58.60-0.04
-0.07%
Distillate US Fdmtl Stblty & Val ETF

DAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DAC has been closely correlated with CMRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DAC jumps, then CMRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DAC
1D Price
Change %
DAC100%
-0.56%
CMRE - DAC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
GSL - DAC
70%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
NMM - DAC
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.08%
SBLK - DAC
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.51%
SB - DAC
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.88%
More

GSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSL has been closely correlated with CMRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GSL jumps, then CMRE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSL
1D Price
Change %
GSL100%
-2.06%
CMRE - GSL
71%
Closely correlated
-2.30%
DAC - GSL
70%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
GNK - GSL
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
NMM - GSL
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
SBLK - GSL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
More