DIN
Price
$35.99
Change
+$0.28 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
456.54M
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RICK
Price
$26.50
Change
-$0.22 (-0.82%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
202.58M
29 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DIN vs RICK

DIN vs RICK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DIN vs. RICK commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DIN is a Hold and RICK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (DIN: $35.99 vs. RICK: $26.50)
Brand notoriety: DIN and RICK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DIN: 62% vs. RICK: 39%
Market capitalization -- DIN: $456.54M vs. RICK: $202.58M
DIN [@Restaurants] is valued at $456.54M. RICK’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $202.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $193.69B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.55B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DIN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRICK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DIN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RICK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, DIN is a better buy in the long-term than RICK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DIN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RICK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DIN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RICK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RICK is a better buy in the short-term than DIN.

Price Growth

DIN (@Restaurants) experienced а +0.95% price change this week, while RICK (@Restaurants) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

DIN is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

RICK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-2.13% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DIN($457M) has a higher market cap than RICK($203M). DIN has higher P/E ratio than RICK: DIN (31.30) vs RICK (21.53). DIN YTD gains are higher at: 13.374 vs. RICK (11.902). DIN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 149M vs. RICK (29.5M). RICK has less debt than DIN: RICK (278M) vs DIN (1.62B). DIN has higher revenues than RICK: DIN (890M) vs RICK (282M).
DINRICKDIN / RICK
Capitalization457M203M225%
EBITDA149M29.5M505%
Gain YTD13.37411.902112%
P/E Ratio31.3021.53145%
Revenue890M282M316%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.62B278M582%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DIN vs RICK: Fundamental Ratings
DIN
RICK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7661
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
398
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

DIN's Valuation (16) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (30) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (100) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

RICK's SMR Rating (93) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry is in the same range as DIN (100) in the Restaurants industry. This means that RICK’s stock grew similarly to DIN’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as RICK (53) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew similarly to RICK’s over the last 12 months.

DIN's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for RICK (98) in the Movies Or Entertainment industry. This means that DIN’s stock grew significantly faster than RICK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DINRICK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RICK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EITMX133.95N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Tx-Mgd Growth 1.1 I
JMNAX14.18N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Research Market Neutral A
TIBCX37.60N/A
N/A
Thornburg Investment Income Builder C
JSCZX20.24N/A
N/A
JPMorgan US Small Company R2
MADRX26.62N/A
N/A
Madison Dividend Income R6

RICK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RICK has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RICK jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RICK
1D Price
Change %
RICK100%
-0.82%
FRSH - RICK
55%
Loosely correlated
+4.54%
DIN - RICK
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
BJRI - RICK
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
LOCO - RICK
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.54%
CAKE - RICK
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.98%
More