DPZ
Price
$522.40
Change
+$8.02 (+1.56%)
Updated
May 6, 6:59 PM EST
73 days until earnings call
YUMC
Price
$37.70
Change
-$0.72 (-1.87%)
Updated
May 6, 6:59 PM EST
86 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

DPZ vs YUMC ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconDPZ vs YUMC Comparison
Open Charts DPZ vs YUMCBanner chart's image
Domino's Pizza
Price$522.40
Change+$8.02 (+1.56%)
Volume$92.77K
CapitalizationN/A
Yum China Holdings
Price$37.70
Change-$0.72 (-1.87%)
Volume$627.54K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
DPZ vs YUMC Comparison Chart

Loading...

DPZDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
YUMCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
DPZ vs. YUMC commentary
May 07, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Hold and YUMC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 07, 2024
Stock price -- (DPZ: $514.33 vs. YUMC: $38.41)
Brand notoriety: DPZ and YUMC are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 94% vs. YUMC: 85%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $17.94B vs. YUMC: $14.98B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $17.94B. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $14.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $194.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, DPZ is a better buy in the long-term than YUMC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPZ is a better buy in the short-term than YUMC.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +3.06% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was -3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.29%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 18, 2024.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.19% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for DPZ with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for YUMC with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
DPZ($17.9B) has a higher market cap than YUMC($15B). DPZ has higher P/E ratio than YUMC: DPZ (33.59) vs YUMC (19.20). DPZ YTD gains are higher at: 25.185 vs. YUMC (-9.136).
DPZYUMCDPZ / YUMC
Capitalization17.9B15B119%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.185-9.136-276%
P/E Ratio33.5919.20175%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
79
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
28100
SMR RATING
1..100
10063
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2893
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
975

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YUMC's Valuation (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (79). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for YUMC (100). This means that DPZ’s stock grew significantly faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's SMR Rating (63) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (61). This means that DPZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

DPZ's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YUMC (93). This means that DPZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than YUMC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
31%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
DPZDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
YUMCDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TIMB18.200.51
+2.88%
TIM SA
FRME34.690.30
+0.87%
First Merchants Corp
CNTY3.10-0.01
-0.32%
Century Casinos
VTRU12.08-0.25
-2.03%
Vitru Limited
YCBD0.86-0.02
-2.05%
cbdMD

YUMC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YUMC and QSR have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YUMC and QSR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUMC
1D Price
Change %
YUMC100%
+2.81%
QSR - YUMC
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
FRSH - YUMC
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.36%
DIN - YUMC
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
YUM - YUMC
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.54%
CNNE - YUMC
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.13%
More