DPZ
Price
$350.95
Change
-$7.48 (-2.09%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
11.61B
61 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
YUMC
Price
$47.72
Change
-$0.47 (-0.98%)
Updated
Aug 7 closing price
Capitalization
16.32B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

DPZ vs YUMC

DPZ vs YUMC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
DPZ vs. YUMC commentary
Aug 08, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is DPZ is a Buy and YUMC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2026
Stock price -- (DPZ: $358.43 vs. YUMC: $48.19)
Brand notoriety: DPZ and YUMC are both notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: DPZ: 36% vs. YUMC: 76%
Market capitalization -- DPZ: $11.61B vs. YUMC: $16.32B
DPZ [@Restaurants] is valued at $11.61B. YUMC’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $16.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $195.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $10.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

DPZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYUMC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • DPZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YUMC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUMC is a better buy in the long-term than DPZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

DPZ’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUMC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • DPZ’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • YUMC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DPZ is a better buy in the short-term than YUMC.

Price Growth

DPZ (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.75% price change this week, while YUMC (@Restaurants) price change was +3.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +2.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

DPZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 08, 2026.

YUMC is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (+2.34% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUMC($16.3B) has a higher market cap than DPZ($11.6B). DPZ has higher P/E ratio than YUMC: DPZ (19.90) vs YUMC (17.48). YUMC YTD gains are higher at: 2.175 vs. DPZ (-13.040). YUMC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.77B vs. DPZ (1.05B). YUMC has less debt than DPZ: YUMC (2.34B) vs DPZ (5.14B). YUMC has higher revenues than DPZ: YUMC (11.8B) vs DPZ (5.03B).
DPZYUMCDPZ / YUMC
Capitalization11.6B16.3B71%
EBITDA1.05B1.77B59%
Gain YTD-13.0402.175-600%
P/E Ratio19.9017.48114%
Revenue5.03B11.8B43%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.14B2.34B219%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
DPZ vs YUMC: Fundamental Ratings
DPZ
YUMC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2831
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10053
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7860
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

YUMC's Valuation (21) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (25). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (100). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's SMR Rating (53) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DPZ (100). This means that YUMC’s stock grew somewhat faster than DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (49). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

YUMC's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as DPZ (78). This means that YUMC’s stock grew similarly to DPZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
DPZYUMC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
DPZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
YUMC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALPS0.410.01
+3.11%
Alps Group Inc.
CHSCM24.72-0.01
-0.04%
CHS
WBS78.78-0.34
-0.43%
Webster Financial Corp
CBAN22.03-0.10
-0.45%
Colony Bankcorp Inc
LU1.49-0.01
-0.67%
Lufax Holding Ltd

DPZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DPZ has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if DPZ jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DPZ
1D Price
Change %
DPZ100%
-2.23%
FRSH - DPZ
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.61%
JACK - DPZ
31%
Poorly correlated
-5.65%
WEN - DPZ
31%
Poorly correlated
-7.51%
YUMC - DPZ
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.45%
PTLO - DPZ
28%
Poorly correlated
-6.21%
More