This E vs. EQNR stock comparison examines two prominent European integrated energy companies navigating volatile oil prices, geopolitical tensions, and the shift toward renewables. Traders seeking short-term momentum and investors focused on dividends and long-term energy transition plays may find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and growth catalysts. With recent sector tailwinds from rising crude benchmarks, understanding these stocks' positioning aids informed decision-making in the dynamic energy market.
Eni S.p.A. (E), an Italian multinational energy firm, engages in exploration, production, refining, chemicals, and renewables across global operations. In recent weeks, E stock has traded around $54 per share, reflecting YTD gains exceeding 40% and one-year returns near 93%. Sentiment has been supported by significant natural gas finds offshore Indonesia and Egypt, alongside an increased share buyback program to €2.8 billion despite softer Q1 earnings. These developments underscore E's exploration prowess and capital return focus, amid favorable LNG demand trends boosting its integrated model. Low beta of 0.26 highlights stability, with a market cap of $79 billion and 4.4% dividend yield.
Equinor ASA (EQNR), Norway's state-controlled energy major, specializes in upstream oil and gas production, offshore wind, and low-carbon solutions worldwide. Recently, EQNR has hovered near $39 per share, delivering robust YTD performance of about 66% and 79% over the past year. Uplifts from climbing oil prices and upcoming Q1 earnings have driven positive momentum, complemented by initiatives like Brazil drilling and a $3 billion JV lending facility with Shell. With a $96 billion market cap, P/E ratio around 20, and 4% dividend yield, EQNR appeals to value-oriented investors, its low volatility profile aiding resilience in turbulent markets.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing bots curated from over 350 AI trading agents that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, paired positions, and leveraged ETF plays, tailored to current market conditions in sectors such as energy, semiconductors, and aerospace. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 170%, win rates reaching 88%, profit factors as high as 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 20—demonstrating robust risk-adjusted performance with average trade durations from 1 day to over 50 days. While neither E nor EQNR features directly, energy sector exposure via multi-ticker bots highlights timely opportunities. Investors can explore these bots for automated insights into volatile markets.
In business models, both E and EQNR are integrated energy players, but EQNR leans heavier on upstream production with aggressive renewables via offshore wind, while E balances refining and chemicals alongside gas exploration. Growth drivers diverge: E's recent discoveries signal resource expansion, contrasting EQNR's project advancements in Brazil and North Sea JVs. Recent momentum favors EQNR with higher YTD returns, though E shows stronger one-year gains. Risk factors include oil price swings and geopolitical exposures, mitigated by low betas; EQNR's larger scale offers diversification. Sector exposure ties both to hydrocarbons yet renewables positioning, with market sentiment lifted by crude rallies favoring EQNR's valuation edge.
Tickeron's AI tools would currently lean toward EQNR in this E vs. EQNR stock comparison, based on trend consistency, lower P/E multiple, superior YTD momentum, and favorable positioning amid rising oil prices and upcoming earnings catalysts. While E's discoveries provide upside potential, EQNR appears probabilistically stronger for near-term relative performance.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
E’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileEQNR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
E’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while EQNR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
E (@Integrated Oil) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while EQNR (@Integrated Oil) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was -4.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.22%.
E is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
EQNR is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.
| E | EQNR | E / EQNR | |
| Capitalization | 78.8B | 91.4B | 86% |
| EBITDA | 20.4B | 39.6B | 52% |
| Gain YTD | 45.918 | 56.741 | 81% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.30 | 16.37 | 142% |
| Revenue | 83B | 104B | 80% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 20.1B | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 31.9B | - |
E | EQNR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 23 Undervalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 87 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 30 | 12 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
E's Valuation (23) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQNR (25). This means that E’s stock grew similarly to EQNR’s over the last 12 months.
E's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQNR (26). This means that E’s stock grew similarly to EQNR’s over the last 12 months.
EQNR's SMR Rating (65) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as E (87). This means that EQNR’s stock grew similarly to E’s over the last 12 months.
E's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as EQNR (44). This means that E’s stock grew similarly to EQNR’s over the last 12 months.
EQNR's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as E (30). This means that EQNR’s stock grew similarly to E’s over the last 12 months.
| E | EQNR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 38% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 61% | 13 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 55% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, E has been closely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if E jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EQNR has been closely correlated with BP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EQNR jumps, then BP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EQNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQNR | 100% | -1.55% | ||
| BP - EQNR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| SU - EQNR | 71% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| XOM - EQNR | 70% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CVE - EQNR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.74% | ||
| SHEL - EQNR | 68% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
More | ||||