ECBK
Price
$13.66
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
FFIC
Price
$14.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
36 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ECBK vs FFIC

Header iconECBK vs FFIC Comparison
Open Charts ECBK vs FFICBanner chart's image
ECB Ban
Price$13.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$20.23K
CapitalizationN/A
Flushing Financial
Price$14.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$164.58K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ECBK vs FFIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
ECBK vs. FFIC commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBK is a Hold and FFIC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ECBK: $13.66 vs. FFIC: $14.55)
Brand notoriety: ECBK and FFIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECBK: 243% vs. FFIC: 83%
Market capitalization -- ECBK: $119.7M vs. FFIC: $366.54M
ECBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $119.7M. FFIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $366.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECBK’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ECBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FFIC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFIC is a better buy in the long-term than ECBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ECBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.16% price change this week, while FFIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECBK is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.

FFIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFIC($367M) has a higher market cap than ECBK($120M). ECBK has higher P/E ratio than FFIC: ECBK (24.90) vs FFIC (13.08). ECBK YTD gains are higher at: 8.758 vs. FFIC (-7.122). ECBK has less debt than FFIC: ECBK (224M) vs FFIC (882M). FFIC has higher revenues than ECBK: FFIC (202M) vs ECBK (26.7M).
ECBKFFICECBK / FFIC
Capitalization120M367M33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.758-7.122-123%
P/E Ratio24.9013.08190%
Revenue26.7M202M13%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt224M882M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIC: Fundamental Ratings
FFIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
98
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
43
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AFVLX22.520.05
+0.22%
Applied Finance Select Investor
TVECX16.81N/A
N/A
Guggenheim RBP® Dividend C
FSUTX122.56-0.04
-0.03%
Fidelity Select Utilities
PDIFX14.45-0.06
-0.41%
Principal Diversified International R6
CICGX10.32-0.05
-0.48%
AB Concentrated International Growth C

ECBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECBK has been loosely correlated with BCOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECBK jumps, then BCOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECBK
1D Price
Change %
ECBK100%
+2.48%
BCOW - ECBK
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.39%
NEWT - ECBK
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
CADE - ECBK
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.06%
FFIC - ECBK
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.82%
LCNB - ECBK
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
More

FFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIC has been closely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFIC jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIC
1D Price
Change %
FFIC100%
+1.82%
HBNC - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
-0.06%
SASR - FFIC
81%
Closely correlated
+2.80%
STBA - FFIC
81%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
WSBC - FFIC
80%
Closely correlated
+0.52%
PFS - FFIC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
More