ECBK
Price
$15.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
FFIC
Price
$17.97
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
71 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ECBK vs FFIC

Header iconECBK vs FFIC Comparison
Open Charts ECBK vs FFICBanner chart's image
ECB Ban
Price$15.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10.02K
CapitalizationN/A
Flushing Financial
Price$17.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$126.9K
CapitalizationN/A
ECBK vs FFIC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ECBK vs. FFIC commentary
Nov 14, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ECBK is a Buy and FFIC is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2024
Stock price -- (ECBK: $15.09 vs. FFIC: $17.99)
Brand notoriety: ECBK and FFIC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ECBK: 89% vs. FFIC: 69%
Market capitalization -- ECBK: $119.7M vs. FFIC: $366.54M
ECBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $119.7M. FFIC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $366.54M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ECBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFIC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ECBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFIC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFIC is a better buy in the long-term than ECBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

ECBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.07% price change this week, while FFIC (@Regional Banks) price change was +16.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

ECBK is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2023.

FFIC is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFIC($367M) has a higher market cap than ECBK($120M). ECBK has higher P/E ratio than FFIC: ECBK (24.90) vs FFIC (13.08). ECBK YTD gains are higher at: 20.143 vs. FFIC (14.836). ECBK has less debt than FFIC: ECBK (224M) vs FFIC (882M). FFIC has higher revenues than ECBK: FFIC (202M) vs ECBK (26.7M).
ECBKFFICECBK / FFIC
Capitalization120M367M33%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD20.14314.836136%
P/E Ratio24.9013.08190%
Revenue26.7M202M13%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt224M882M25%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIC: Fundamental Ratings
FFIC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
88
SMR RATING
1..100
24
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
17
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFIC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NRSRX51.43-0.03
-0.06%
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity R6
MCSDX41.17-0.18
-0.44%
NYLI WMC Enduring Capital Class R6
RYFIX101.06-0.61
-0.60%
Rydex Financial Services Inv
DBICX9.79-0.08
-0.81%
DWS Global Macro C
TIEWX13.87-0.26
-1.84%
Nuveen International Eq W

ECBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ECBK has been loosely correlated with BCOW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ECBK jumps, then BCOW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ECBK
1D Price
Change %
ECBK100%
-0.72%
BCOW - ECBK
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.50%
KRNY - ECBK
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.18%
PLBC - ECBK
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.35%
FFIC - ECBK
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
LOB - ECBK
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
More

FFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIC has been closely correlated with NWBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFIC jumps, then NWBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIC
1D Price
Change %
FFIC100%
-1.05%
NWBI - FFIC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.47%
STBA - FFIC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.44%
UBSI - FFIC
83%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
HBNC - FFIC
83%
Closely correlated
-1.01%
BY - FFIC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.25%
More