Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
EMQCX vs FNWFX
EMQCX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs FNWFX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$7.72
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World F3
Price$80.99
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
EMQCX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs. FNWFX commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Sell and FNWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 61.7B vs. EMQCX (22.1M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than EMQCX: FNWFX (1.56) vs EMQCX (1.05). EMQCX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: EMQCX (8 years) vs FNWFX (8 years). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. FNWFX (32.00). EMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: EMQCX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). EMQCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.35 vs. FNWFX (11.67). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 18.35 vs. EMQCX (-23.38).
| EMQCX | FNWFX | EMQCX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.001 | 7.987 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.1M | 61.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.35 | 11.67 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | -35.29 | -11.05 | 320% |
| Returns for 5 years | -23.38 | 18.35 | -127% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...