Ad is loading...
EMQCX vs FNWFX
EMQCX vs FNWFX Comparison
Open Charts EMQCX vs FNWFX
Ashmore Emerging Markets Active Eq C
Price$7.69
Change-$0.04 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds New World F3
Price$83.10
Change-$0.10 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
EMQCX vs FNWFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
EMQCX vs. FNWFX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is EMQCX is a Buy and FNWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FNWFX has more cash in the bank: 63.1B vs. EMQCX (22.1M). FNWFX pays higher dividends than EMQCX: FNWFX (1.56) vs EMQCX (1.05). EMQCX was incepted earlier than FNWFX: EMQCX (8 years) vs FNWFX (8 years). EMQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 189.00 vs. FNWFX (32.00). EMQCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNWFX: EMQCX (1000) vs FNWFX (1000000). FNWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.70 vs. EMQCX (16.17). FNWFX return over 5 years is better than : 25.74 vs. EMQCX (-21.70).
| EMQCX | FNWFX | EMQCX / FNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.591 | 10.800 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.1M | 63.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.17 | 18.70 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | -34.59 | -9.66 | 358% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.70 | 25.74 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...