It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ESOA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTRX’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ESOA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTRX’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
ESOA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +4.14% price change this week, while MTRX (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -3.77% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.61%.
ESOA is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.
MTRX is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
ESOA | MTRX | ESOA / MTRX | |
Capitalization | 230M | 345M | 67% |
EBITDA | 44.3M | -8.18M | -541% |
Gain YTD | 131.605 | 28.016 | 470% |
P/E Ratio | 9.55 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 352M | 745M | 47% |
Total Cash | 14.5M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 34.4M | 21.6M | 159% |
ESOA | MTRX | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ESOA's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRX (86) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ESOA’s stock grew similarly to MTRX’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTRX (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ESOA’s stock grew significantly faster than MTRX’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTRX (90) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ESOA’s stock grew significantly faster than MTRX’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRX (41) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ESOA’s stock grew similarly to MTRX’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MTRX (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that ESOA’s stock grew similarly to MTRX’s over the last 12 months.
ESOA | MTRX | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago74% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago81% | 3 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago81% | 3 days ago78% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago82% | 3 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago84% | 12 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago75% | 3 days ago77% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago84% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago78% | 3 days ago77% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
DNLAX | 47.71 | -0.10 | -0.21% |
BNY Mellon Natural Resources A | |||
VSPVX | 422.99 | -1.35 | -0.32% |
Vanguard S&P 500 Value Index Instl | |||
DURSX | 12.93 | -0.08 | -0.61% |
DWS ESG International Core Eq S | |||
GMUEX | 14.70 | -0.22 | -1.47% |
GMO US Equity III | |||
MNHIX | 26.82 | -0.42 | -1.54% |
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term I |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ESOA and GLDD have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ESOA and GLDD's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ESOA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ESOA | 100% | -1.56% | ||
GLDD - ESOA | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.61% | ||
ACA - ESOA | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.20% | ||
BLNK - ESOA | 26% Poorly correlated | -5.59% | ||
MTRX - ESOA | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
BWMN - ESOA | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTRX has been loosely correlated with BRANF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTRX jumps, then BRANF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTRX | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
MTRX | 100% | -2.34% | ||
BRANF - MTRX | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
GLDD - MTRX | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.61% | ||
ACA - MTRX | 34% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
EME - MTRX | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.15% | ||
STRL - MTRX | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
More |