Ad is loading...
FAT
Price
$5.29
Change
-$0.21 (-3.82%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
121 days until earnings call
YOSH
Price
$3.04
Change
-$0.08 (-2.56%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

FAT vs YOSH

Header iconFAT vs YOSH Comparison
Open Charts FAT vs YOSHBanner chart's image
FAT Brands
Price$5.29
Change-$0.21 (-3.82%)
Volume$23.16K
CapitalizationN/A
Yoshiharu Global
Price$3.04
Change-$0.08 (-2.56%)
Volume$33.4K
CapitalizationN/A
FAT vs YOSH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FAT vs. YOSH commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FAT is a StrongSell and YOSH is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FAT: $5.29 vs. YOSH: $3.04)
Brand notoriety: FAT and YOSH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FAT: 121% vs. YOSH: 106%
Market capitalization -- FAT: $89.68M vs. YOSH: $4.08M
FAT [@Restaurants] is valued at $89.68M. YOSH’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $4.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $209.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FAT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYOSH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FAT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • YOSH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FAT is a better buy in the long-term than YOSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FAT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FAT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FAT (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while YOSH (@Restaurants) price change was -32.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

FAT is expected to report earnings on Mar 19, 2025.

YOSH is expected to report earnings on Mar 30, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.48% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FAT($89.7M) has a higher market cap than YOSH($4.08M). FAT YTD gains are higher at: -4.203 vs. YOSH (-44.015). FAT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 26.1M vs. YOSH (-1.8M). FAT has more cash in the bank: 16.6M vs. YOSH (1.19M). YOSH has less debt than FAT: YOSH (15.5M) vs FAT (1.44B). FAT has higher revenues than YOSH: FAT (606M) vs YOSH (10.7M).
FATYOSHFAT / YOSH
Capitalization89.7M4.08M2,197%
EBITDA26.1M-1.8M-1,446%
Gain YTD-4.203-44.01510%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue606M10.7M5,664%
Total Cash16.6M1.19M1,390%
Total Debt1.44B15.5M9,277%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAT: Fundamental Ratings
FAT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
44
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FAT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FAT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WPRT4.150.10
+2.47%
Westport Fuel Systems
WAFD36.96-0.01
-0.03%
WaFd
RIVN10.06-0.25
-2.42%
Rivian Automotive
QH1.27-0.05
-3.79%
Quhuo Limited
CLNE2.65-0.21
-7.34%
Clean Energy Fuels Corp

YOSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YOSH and YUMC have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YOSH and YUMC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YOSH
1D Price
Change %
YOSH100%
-2.56%
YUMC - YOSH
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
HELFY - YOSH
8%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
THCH - YOSH
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.71%
FAT - YOSH
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
PTLO - YOSH
5%
Poorly correlated
-2.36%
More