Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FATWX vs RBEDX
FATWX vs RBEDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FATWX vs. RBEDX commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FATWX is a Hold and RBEDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEDX has more cash in the bank: 33.4B vs. FATWX (2.19B). RBEDX (1.89) and FATWX (1.81) have matching dividends . FATWX was incepted earlier than RBEDX: FATWX (21 years) vs RBEDX (10 years). FATWX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 21.00 vs. RBEDX (5.00). FATWX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBEDX: FATWX (0) vs RBEDX (250). FATWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.78 vs. RBEDX (13.93). RBEDX return over 5 years is better than : 15.88 vs. FATWX (4.48).
| FATWX | RBEDX | FATWX / RBEDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.874 | 8.526 | 92% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.19B | 33.4B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 1.89 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.78 | 13.93 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.98 | -3.74 | 214% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.48 | 15.88 | 28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.02 | 29.56 | 17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers