FCAP
Price
$27.79
Change
+$0.29 (+1.05%)
Updated
May 1, 6:59 PM EST
85 days until earnings call
MVBF
Price
$18.39
Change
+$0.42 (+2.34%)
Updated
May 1, 6:59 PM EST
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FCAP vs MVBF ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?

Header iconFCAP vs MVBF Comparison
Open Charts FCAP vs MVBFBanner chart's image
First Capital
Price$27.79
Change+$0.29 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MVB Financial
Price$18.39
Change+$0.42 (+2.34%)
Volume$19.79K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FCAP vs MVBF Comparison Chart

Loading...

MVBFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
FCAP vs. MVBF commentary
May 02, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCAP is a Hold and MVBF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
May 02, 2024
Stock price -- (FCAP: $27.50 vs. MVBF: $17.97)
Brand notoriety: FCAP and MVBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCAP: 276% vs. MVBF: 105%
Market capitalization -- FCAP: $95.66M vs. MVBF: $283.06M
FCAP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $95.66M. MVBF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $283.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCAP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMVBF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCAP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MVBF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCAP is a better buy in the long-term than MVBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MVBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MVBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

FCAP (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.26% price change this week, while MVBF (@Regional Banks) price change was -11.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCAP is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

MVBF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FCAP with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for MVBF with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MVBF($283M) has a higher market cap than FCAP($95.7M). MVBF has higher P/E ratio than FCAP: MVBF (12.82) vs FCAP (7.67). FCAP YTD gains are higher at: -0.470 vs. MVBF (-19.700). FCAP has more cash in the bank: 18M vs. MVBF (8.11M). FCAP has less debt than MVBF: FCAP (28M) vs MVBF (80.3M). MVBF has higher revenues than FCAP: MVBF (146M) vs FCAP (42.9M).
FCAPMVBFFCAP / MVBF
Capitalization95.7M283M34%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.470-19.7002%
P/E Ratio7.6712.8260%
Revenue42.9M146M29%
Total Cash18M8.11M222%
Total Debt28M80.3M35%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCAP vs MVBF: Fundamental Ratings
FCAP
MVBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1753
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10081
SMR RATING
1..100
4124
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4862
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4086
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MVBF's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (47) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

MVBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

MVBF's SMR Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FCAP (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that MVBF’s stock grew similarly to FCAP’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as MVBF (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew similarly to MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

FCAP's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MVBF (86) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FCAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than MVBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MVBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
MVBFDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSKLX10.86-0.08
-0.73%
Fidelity SAI Intl Low Volatil Idx
JEVIX11.48-0.12
-1.03%
JHancock Emerging Markets I
AVPEX12.74-0.16
-1.24%
ALPS Global Opportunity III
FLUEX25.31-0.34
-1.33%
Fidelity Advisor Stk Selec Lg Cp Val C
BIASX22.22-0.43
-1.90%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Growth Inv

FCAP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCAP and OPHC have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCAP and OPHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCAP
1D Price
Change %
FCAP100%
-3.51%
OPHC - FCAP
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.75%
SSBI - FCAP
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.84%
BOTJ - FCAP
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.30%
LNKB - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
HTBK - FCAP
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
More