Ad is loading...
FCCQX vs MKCMX
FCCQX vs MKCMX Comparison
Open Charts FCCQX vs MKCMX
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc A
Price$11.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
BlackRock California Munl Opps Inv K
Price$12.03
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FCCQX vs MKCMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FCCQX vs. MKCMX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCCQX is a Hold and MKCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKCMX has more cash in the bank: 2.4B vs. FCCQX (1.35B). MKCMX pays higher dividends than FCCQX: MKCMX (3.10) vs FCCQX (2.81). FCCQX was incepted earlier than MKCMX: FCCQX (6 years) vs MKCMX (7 years). MKCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. FCCQX (18.50). FCCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MKCMX: FCCQX (1000) vs MKCMX (5000000). MKCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.52 vs. FCCQX (5.58). MKCMX return over 5 years is better than : 7.35 vs. FCCQX (-1.32).
| FCCQX | MKCMX | FCCQX / MKCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.654 | 3.205 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 5000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.35B | 2.4B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.81 | 3.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 7.52 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.37 | 0.59 | -567% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.32 | 7.35 | -18% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |