Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
FDCF vs MRAD
FDCF vs MRAD Comparison
Open Charts FDCF vs MRAD
FDCF vs MRAD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDCF vs. MRAD commentary
Nov 23, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDCF is a StrongSell and MRAD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FDCF has more net assets: 58M vs. MRAD (772K). FDCF has a higher annual dividend yield than MRAD: FDCF (30.401) vs MRAD (0.205). FDCF was incepted earlier than MRAD: FDCF (5 years) vs MRAD (4 years). MRAD has a higher turnover FDCF (17.00) vs FDCF (17.00).
| FDCF | MRAD | FDCF / MRAD | |
| Gain YTD | 30.401 | 0.205 | 14,856% |
| Net Assets | 58M | 772K | 7,513% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 17.00 | 19.70 | 86% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDCF | MRAD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 68% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 24 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 24 days ago 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FDCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDCF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDCF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDCF | 100% | +0.23% | ||
| TSM - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +1.53% | ||
| CDNS - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| AMZN - FDCF | 68% Closely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| ANET - FDCF | 66% Closely correlated | +6.09% | ||
| SNPS - FDCF | 65% Loosely correlated | +3.02% | ||
More | ||||
MRAD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRAD has been loosely correlated with ILLMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRAD jumps, then ILLMF could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MRAD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MRAD | 100% | N/A | ||
| ILLMF - MRAD | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| GOOGL - MRAD | 9% Poorly correlated | -4.74% | ||
| RAMP - MRAD | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.79% | ||
| TTD - MRAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.78% | ||
| CRTO - MRAD | 6% Poorly correlated | +1.30% | ||
More | ||||