Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDESX vs RGEBX
FDESX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDESX vs RGEBX
FDESX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDESX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDESX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 361B vs. FDESX (4.24B). FDESX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FDESX (0.45) vs RGEBX (0.00). FDESX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDESX (56 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FDESX (0.41). FDESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FDESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FDESX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FDESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.30 vs. RGEBX (7.20). FDESX return over 5 years is better than : 15.82 vs. RGEBX (14.27).
| FDESX | RGEBX | FDESX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.08 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.08 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 56 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.264 | 6.092 | 152% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.24B | 361B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.30 | 7.20 | 240% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.42 | 42.44 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.82 | 14.27 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 110.25 | 99.06 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers