Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDESX vs RGEBX
FDESX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FDESX vs RGEBX
FDESX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDESX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jul 22, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDESX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 357B vs. FDESX (4.27B). FDESX pays higher dividends than RGEBX: FDESX (0.45) vs RGEBX (0.00). FDESX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FDESX (56 years) vs RGEBX (12 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than FDESX (0.41). FDESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 85.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). FDESX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGEBX: FDESX (0) vs RGEBX (250). FDESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.85 vs. RGEBX (0.78). FDESX return over 5 years is better than : 17.05 vs. RGEBX (10.60).
| FDESX | RGEBX | FDESX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.08 | 38% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.41 | 1.08 | 38% |
| Fund Existence | 56 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.430 | 5.087 | 225% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.27B | 357B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.85 | 0.78 | 1,786% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.49 | 34.35 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.05 | 10.60 | 161% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.89 | 90.38 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement