FFNW
Price
$20.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
90 days until earnings call
IBCP
Price
$25.17
Change
+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Updated
Apr 25, 6:59 PM EST
90 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Compare predictions FFNW vs IBCP

Header iconFFNW vs IBCP Comparison
Open Charts FFNW vs IBCPBanner chart's image
First Financial Northwest
Price$20.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$30.36K
CapitalizationN/A
Independent Bank
Price$25.17
Change+$0.05 (+0.20%)
Volume$77.4K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FFNW vs IBCP Comparison Chart

Loading...

FFNWDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
IBCPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
FFNW vs. IBCP commentary
Apr 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNW is a Buy and IBCP is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 26, 2024
Stock price -- (FFNW: $20.50 vs. IBCP: $25.17)
Brand notoriety: FFNW and IBCP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFNW: 179% vs. IBCP: 229%
Market capitalization -- FFNW: $189.91M vs. IBCP: $529.95M
FFNW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $189.91M. IBCP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $529.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFNW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIBCP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFNW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IBCP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, IBCP is a better buy in the long-term than FFNW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFNW’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IBCP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFNW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFNW is a better buy in the short-term than IBCP.

Price Growth

FFNW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.84% price change this week, while IBCP (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFNW is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

IBCP is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.73% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FFNW with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for IBCP with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IBCP($530M) has a higher market cap than FFNW($190M). FFNW has higher P/E ratio than IBCP: FFNW (30.00) vs IBCP (8.82). FFNW YTD gains are higher at: 53.043 vs. IBCP (-2.335). IBCP has more cash in the bank: 58.6M vs. FFNW (8.07M). FFNW (128M) and IBCP (129M) have identical debt. IBCP has higher revenues than FFNW: IBCP (200M) vs FFNW (43.3M).
FFNWIBCPFFNW / IBCP
Capitalization190M530M36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD53.043-2.335-2,271%
P/E Ratio30.008.82340%
Revenue43.3M200M22%
Total Cash8.07M58.6M14%
Total Debt128M129M99%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFNW vs IBCP: Fundamental Ratings
FFNW
IBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
415
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3242
SMR RATING
1..100
6319
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3943
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
521
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IBCP's Valuation (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFNW (87) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that IBCP’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

IBCP's SMR Rating (19) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFNW (63) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that IBCP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as IBCP (21) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to IBCP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFNWIBCP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFNWDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
IBCPDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVVCX10.79N/A
N/A
Guggenheim RBP® Large-Cap Value C
HILCX17.93-0.04
-0.22%
Hartford International Value C
MNVRX28.28-0.13
-0.46%
Madison Investors R6
HSMSX12.25-0.10
-0.81%
Hartford Small Cap Value R4
THOCX34.45-0.32
-0.92%
Thornburg Global Opportunities C

FFNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFNW has been loosely correlated with TSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFNW jumps, then TSBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFNW
1D Price
Change %
FFNW100%
N/A
TSBK - FFNW
45%
Loosely correlated
-4.56%
SMBC - FFNW
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.03%
BSRR - FFNW
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
GABC - FFNW
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.35%
OSBC - FFNW
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.21%
More

IBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IBCP has been closely correlated with TOWN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IBCP jumps, then TOWN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IBCP
1D Price
Change %
IBCP100%
+0.20%
TOWN - IBCP
86%
Closely correlated
-2.16%
MSBI - IBCP
84%
Closely correlated
-1.19%
ABCB - IBCP
84%
Closely correlated
-1.53%
THFF - IBCP
84%
Closely correlated
-0.81%
UBSI - IBCP
84%
Closely correlated
-4.03%
More