FFNW
Price
$22.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
36 days until earnings call
SBFG
Price
$18.55
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
40 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFNW vs SBFG

Header iconFFNW vs SBFG Comparison
Open Charts FFNW vs SBFGBanner chart's image
First Financial Northwest
Price$22.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$22.13K
CapitalizationN/A
SB Financial Group
Price$18.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$15.17K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FFNW vs SBFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FFNW vs. SBFG commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNW is a StrongBuy and SBFG is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FFNW: $22.61 vs. SBFG: $18.55)
Brand notoriety: FFNW and SBFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFNW: 51% vs. SBFG: 159%
Market capitalization -- FFNW: $189.91M vs. SBFG: $95.02M
FFNW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $189.91M. SBFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $95.02M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFNW’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFNW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBFG is a better buy in the long-term than FFNW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFNW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

FFNW (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while SBFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFNW is expected to report earnings on Oct 24, 2024.

SBFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.23% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFNW($190M) has a higher market cap than SBFG($95M). FFNW has higher P/E ratio than SBFG: FFNW (30.00) vs SBFG (8.00). FFNW YTD gains are higher at: 69.853 vs. SBFG (24.250). SBFG has more cash in the bank: 19M vs. FFNW (8.07M). SBFG has less debt than FFNW: SBFG (103M) vs FFNW (128M). SBFG has higher revenues than FFNW: SBFG (57M) vs FFNW (43.3M).
FFNWSBFGFFNW / SBFG
Capitalization190M95M200%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD69.85324.250288%
P/E Ratio30.008.00375%
Revenue43.3M57M76%
Total Cash8.07M19M42%
Total Debt128M103M124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFNW vs SBFG: Fundamental Ratings
FFNW
SBFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7329
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1848
SMR RATING
1..100
7252
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4237
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
229
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBFG's Valuation (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFNW (92) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SBFG (48) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to SBFG’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's SMR Rating (52) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FFNW (72) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

SBFG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as FFNW (42) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that SBFG’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SBFG (29) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to SBFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEYCX8.970.06
+0.67%
Delaware Climate Solutions C
GEMRX13.490.02
+0.15%
abrdn Emerging Markets R
IJSIX16.33N/A
N/A
VY® JPMorgan Small Cap Core Equity I
GEFPX14.98N/A
N/A
Gotham Enhanced 500 Plus Institutional
OSMAX45.00-0.08
-0.18%
Invesco International Small-Mid Com A

SBFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SBFG has been loosely correlated with FUSB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SBFG jumps, then FUSB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBFG
1D Price
Change %
SBFG100%
+0.16%
FUSB - SBFG
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
FUNC - SBFG
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.58%
TBNK - SBFG
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.71%
FFNW - SBFG
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
PLBC - SBFG
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
More