Ad is loading...
FGSCX vs RPMGX
FGSCX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSCX vs RPMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth C
Price$24.62
Change+$0.03 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$109.07
Change-$0.77 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSCX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FGSCX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSCX is a Buy and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. FGSCX (1.69B). RPMGX pays higher dividends than FGSCX: RPMGX (0.05) vs FGSCX (0.00). FGSCX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FGSCX (29 years) vs RPMGX (32 years). FGSCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. RPMGX (21.70). FGSCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: FGSCX (1500) vs RPMGX (2500). FGSCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 35.05 vs. RPMGX (14.65). RPMGX return over 5 years is better than : 14.51 vs. FGSCX (-10.28).
| FGSCX | RPMGX | FGSCX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.743 | 9.026 | 197% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 31.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 35.05 | 14.65 | 239% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.65 | -13.81 | 222% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.28 | 14.51 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | -38.19 | 43.29 | -88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...