Ad is loading...
FGSKX vs RPMGX
FGSKX vs RPMGX Comparison
Open Charts FGSKX vs RPMGX
Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth R6
Price$49.27
Change+$0.05 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth
Price$109.07
Change-$0.77 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGSKX vs RPMGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FGSKX vs. RPMGX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGSKX is a Buy and RPMGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPMGX has more cash in the bank: 31.4B vs. FGSKX (1.69B). RPMGX pays higher dividends than FGSKX: RPMGX (0.05) vs FGSKX (0.00). FGSKX was incepted earlier than RPMGX: FGSKX (18 years) vs RPMGX (32 years). FGSKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 142.00 vs. RPMGX (21.70). FGSKX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPMGX: FGSKX (0) vs RPMGX (2500). FGSKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.52 vs. RPMGX (14.65). FGSKX return over 5 years is better than : 26.33 vs. RPMGX (14.51).
| FGSKX | RPMGX | FGSKX / RPMGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.694 | 9.026 | 207% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.69B | 31.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.05 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 36.52 | 14.65 | 249% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.67 | -13.81 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.33 | 14.51 | 181% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.06 | 43.29 | 16% |