Ad is loading...
FHKIX vs MCSMX
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison
Open Charts FHKIX vs MCSMX
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$36.85
Change-$0.19 (-0.51%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Matthews China Small Companies
Price$8.10
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKIX vs MCSMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FHKIX vs. MCSMX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKIX is a Sell and MCSMX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. MCSMX (64.3M). MCSMX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: MCSMX (2.41) vs FHKIX (1.81). FHKIX was incepted earlier than MCSMX: FHKIX (16 years) vs MCSMX (13 years). MCSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.05 vs. FHKIX (24.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than MCSMX: FHKIX (0) vs MCSMX (2500). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.88 vs. MCSMX (-14.50). FHKIX return over 5 years is better than : 7.86 vs. MCSMX (-27.63).
| FHKIX | MCSMX | FHKIX / MCSMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.990 | -9.609 | -166% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 64.3M | 1,617% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.81 | 2.41 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.88 | -14.50 | -144% |
| Returns for 3 years | -22.06 | -57.60 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.86 | -27.63 | -28% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.21 | -7.30 | -167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers