Ad is loading...
FHKTX vs GSAFX
FHKTX vs GSAFX Comparison
Open Charts FHKTX vs GSAFX
Fidelity Advisor China Region M
Price$36.28
Change-$0.19 (-0.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6
Price$19.30
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FHKTX vs GSAFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FHKTX vs. GSAFX commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHKTX is a Sell and GSAFX is a Sell.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKTX has more cash in the bank: 1.04B vs. GSAFX (34.3M). GSAFX (1.23) and FHKTX (1.22) have matching dividends . FHKTX was incepted earlier than GSAFX: FHKTX (16 years) vs GSAFX (7 years). GSAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FHKTX (24.00). FHKTX has a lower initial minimum investment than GSAFX: FHKTX (0) vs GSAFX (5000000). FHKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.27 vs. GSAFX (-2.89). FHKTX return over 5 years is better than : 5.33 vs. GSAFX (-25.52).
| FHKTX | GSAFX | FHKTX / GSAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.578 | 1.900 | 820% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 5000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 34.3M | 3,032% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.22 | 1.23 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.27 | -2.89 | -701% |
| Returns for 3 years | -23.47 | -46.64 | 50% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.33 | -25.52 | -21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.29 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers