Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLN vs ILF
FLN vs ILF Comparison
Open Charts FLN vs ILF
FLN vs ILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLN vs. ILF commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLN is a Buy and ILF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ILF has more net assets: 3.84B vs. FLN (37.9M). ILF (17.640) and FLN (17.405) have matching annual dividend yield . FLN was incepted earlier than ILF: FLN (15 years) vs ILF (25 years). ILF (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than FLN (0.80). FLN has a higher turnover ILF (10.00) vs ILF (10.00).
| FLN | ILF | FLN / ILF | |
| Gain YTD | 17.405 | 17.640 | 99% |
| Net Assets | 37.9M | 3.84B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.47 | 170% |
| Turnover | 100.00 | 10.00 | 1,000% |
| Yield | 3.38 | 3.34 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FLN | ILF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FLN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLN has been loosely correlated with BAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLN jumps, then BAP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLN | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| BAP - FLN | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| NU - FLN | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| PAGS - FLN | 37% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
| OMAB - FLN | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| LTM - FLN | 12% Poorly correlated | -2.19% |
ILF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ILF has been closely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ILF jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ILF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ILF | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| BBD - ILF | 84% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| BSAC - ILF | 75% Closely correlated | -1.31% | ||
| VALE - ILF | 73% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| GGB - ILF | 69% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| NU - ILF | 67% Closely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||