FLO vs SENEB
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and SENEB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSENEB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SENEB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FLO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while SENEB (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.90%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2024.
SENEB is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+1.01% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| FLO | SENEB | FLO / SENEB | |
| Capitalization | 5B | 409M | 1,223% |
| EBITDA | 345M | 145M | 238% |
| Gain YTD | 14.487 | 15.660 | 93% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.74 | 7.48 | 544% |
| Revenue | 5.09B | 1.48B | 344% |
| Total Cash | 22.5M | 7.17M | 314% |
| Total Debt | 1.35B | 669M | 202% |
FLO | SENEB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 71 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 35 | 29 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLO's Valuation (18) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SENEB (71). This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SENEB’s over the last 12 months.
SENEB's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (35). This means that SENEB’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.
SENEB's SMR Rating (72) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (75). This means that SENEB’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.
SENEB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (45). This means that SENEB’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.
FLO's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SENEB (61). This means that FLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than SENEB’s over the last 12 months.
| FLO | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 38% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 41% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 40% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INQQ | 14.49 | 0.19 | +1.33% |
| India Internet & Ecommerce ETF | |||
| AFLG | 31.16 | 0.40 | +1.30% |
| First Trust Active Factor Large Cap ETF | |||
| ROUS | 48.12 | 0.48 | +1.01% |
| Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | |||
| FLRN | 30.79 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| SPDR® Blmbg Inv Grd Flt Rt ETF | |||
| SCJ | 73.30 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| iShares MSCI Japan Small-Cap ETF | |||
FLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
SENEB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SENEB and SENEA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SENEB and SENEA's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SENEB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SENEB | 100% | N/A | ||
| SENEA - SENEB | 27% Poorly correlated | +1.47% | ||
| BRCC - SENEB | 21% Poorly correlated | +10.10% | ||
| HLF - SENEB | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.53% | ||
| HRL - SENEB | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| MDLZ - SENEB | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||