FLWS
Price
$8.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
43 days until earnings call
WINA
Price
$372.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 17 closing price
28 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLWS vs WINA

Header iconFLWS vs WINA Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs WINABanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$8.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$282.15K
CapitalizationN/A
Winmark
Price$372.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$38.7K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FLWS vs WINA Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WINA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FLWS vs. WINA commentary
Sep 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Buy and WINA is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 19, 2024
Stock price -- (FLWS: $8.02 vs. WINA: $372.58)
Brand notoriety: FLWS: Notable vs. WINA: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 93% vs. WINA: 113%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $698.5M vs. WINA: $1.27B
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $698.5M. WINA’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $1.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWINA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WINA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WINA is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WINA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WINA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLWS is a better buy in the short-term than WINA.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +9.71% price change this week, while WINA (@Specialty Stores) price change was +7.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.

WINA is expected to report earnings on Oct 16, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+3.70% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WINA($1.27B) has a higher market cap than FLWS($699M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than WINA: FLWS (156.25) vs WINA (32.99). WINA YTD gains are higher at: -10.149 vs. FLWS (-25.603). WINA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 55.5M vs. FLWS (1.43M). FLWS has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. WINA (13.4M). WINA has less debt than FLWS: WINA (72.8M) vs FLWS (318M). FLWS has higher revenues than WINA: FLWS (1.91B) vs WINA (83.2M).
FLWSWINAFLWS / WINA
Capitalization699M1.27B55%
EBITDA1.43M55.5M3%
Gain YTD-25.603-10.149252%
P/E Ratio156.2532.99474%
Revenue1.91B83.2M2,292%
Total Cash312M13.4M2,328%
Total Debt318M72.8M437%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs WINA: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
WINA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
610
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10012
SMR RATING
1..100
902
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
162
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WINA's Valuation (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (94) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that WINA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

WINA's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that WINA’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

WINA's SMR Rating (2) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (90) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that WINA’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

WINA's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (64) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that WINA’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WINA (62) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than WINA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSWINA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WINA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FESCX10.510.11
+1.06%
First Eagle Small Cap Opportunity I
PJNQX56.370.57
+1.02%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6
VTMSX93.730.73
+0.78%
Vanguard Tax-Managed Small Cap Adm
LKSMX10.700.07
+0.66%
LKCM Small-Mid Cap Equity Institutional
LAFAX27.12-0.14
-0.51%
Columbia Acorn International Sel A

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with CWH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then CWH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
+2.30%
CWH - FLWS
57%
Loosely correlated
+5.64%
ABG - FLWS
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
PAG - FLWS
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
SBH - FLWS
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
RH - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More

WINA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WINA has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WINA jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WINA
1D Price
Change %
WINA100%
+3.21%
CPRT - WINA
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
PAG - WINA
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
GPI - WINA
40%
Loosely correlated
+3.29%
FLWS - WINA
40%
Loosely correlated
+2.30%
ABG - WINA
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
More