FNVTU
Price
$11.71
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
PLTYF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

FNVTU vs PLTYF

Header iconFNVTU vs PLTYF Comparison
Open Charts FNVTU vs PLTYFBanner chart's image
Finnovate Acquisition
Price$11.71
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$299
CapitalizationN/A
Plastec Technologies
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FNVTU vs PLTYF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
FNVTU vs. PLTYF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNVTU is a Buy and PLTYF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FNVTU: $11.71 vs. PLTYF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: FNVTU and PLTYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNVTU: 84% vs. PLTYF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FNVTU: $0 vs. PLTYF: $194.07K
FNVTU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. PLTYF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $194.07K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNVTU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLTYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FNVTU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PLTYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FNVTU and PLTYF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

FNVTU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PLTYF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.44% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PLTYF YTD gains are higher at: 29.032 vs. FNVTU (6.455). FNVTU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.6M vs. PLTYF (-2.94M). PLTYF has more cash in the bank: 97.4M vs. FNVTU (94.1K). FNVTU has less debt than PLTYF: FNVTU (450K) vs PLTYF (23.4M). FNVTU (0) and PLTYF (0) have equivalent revenues.
FNVTUPLTYFFNVTU / PLTYF
CapitalizationN/A194K-
EBITDA-1.6M-2.94M55%
Gain YTD6.45529.03222%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash94.1K97.4M0%
Total Debt450K23.4M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PLTYF: Fundamental Ratings
PLTYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
40

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME21.660.39
+1.83%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X67612.720000571.609400
+0.85%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA221.331.76
+0.80%
Tesla
SPY582.302.52
+0.43%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL231.78-2.07
-0.89%
Apple

FNVTU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNVTU has been loosely correlated with BRKHU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FNVTU jumps, then BRKHU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNVTU
1D Price
Change %
FNVTU100%
N/A
BRKHU - FNVTU
45%
Loosely correlated
-7.96%
WEL - FNVTU
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
NPWR - FNVTU
30%
Poorly correlated
+8.17%
BEEP - FNVTU
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
PLTYF - FNVTU
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PLTYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PLTYF and JWSM have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLTYF and JWSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PLTYF
1D Price
Change %
PLTYF100%
N/A
JWSM - PLTYF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNVTU - PLTYF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FORL - PLTYF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRNW - PLTYF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.91%
MEIL - PLTYF
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
More