FUL
Price
$74.23
Change
+$0.60 (+0.81%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
53 days until earnings call
HUN
Price
$24.00
Change
+$0.33 (+1.39%)
Updated
Apr 26, 6:59 PM EST
5 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

Analysis and predictions FUL vs HUN

Header iconFUL vs HUN Comparison
Open Charts FUL vs HUNBanner chart's image
HB Fuller
Price$74.23
Change+$0.60 (+0.81%)
Volume$48.69K
CapitalizationN/A
Huntsman
Price$24.00
Change+$0.33 (+1.39%)
Volume$243.16K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FUL vs HUN Comparison Chart

Loading...

FULDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
HUNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
VS
FUL vs. HUN commentary
Apr 27, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FUL is a StrongSell and HUN is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 27, 2024
Stock price -- (FUL: $74.23 vs. HUN: $23.99)
Brand notoriety: FUL and HUN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FUL: 93% vs. HUN: 54%
Market capitalization -- FUL: $4.35B vs. HUN: $4.5B
FUL [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.35B. HUN’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHUN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HUN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FUL and HUN are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FUL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUN’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • HUN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the short-term than HUN.

Price Growth

FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -3.53% price change this week, while HUN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +1.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jun 19, 2024.

HUN is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+0.06% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FUL with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for HUN with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HUN($4.5B) and FUL($4.35B) have the same market capitalization . HUN has higher P/E ratio than FUL: HUN (46.73) vs FUL (28.70). HUN YTD gains are higher at: -3.602 vs. FUL (-8.570). FUL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 540M vs. HUN (442M). HUN has more cash in the bank: 540M vs. FUL (165M). FUL has less debt than HUN: FUL (1.83B) vs HUN (2.07B). HUN has higher revenues than FUL: HUN (6.11B) vs FUL (3.51B).
FULHUNFUL / HUN
Capitalization4.35B4.5B96%
EBITDA540M442M122%
Gain YTD-8.570-3.602238%
P/E Ratio28.7046.7361%
Revenue3.51B6.11B57%
Total Cash165M540M31%
Total Debt1.83B2.07B89%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FUL vs HUN: Fundamental Ratings
FUL
HUN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6657
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2773
SMR RATING
1..100
7487
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5759
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
341
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HUN's Valuation (20) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (72) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUN (73) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUN’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (74) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as HUN (87) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as HUN (59) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to HUN’s over the last 12 months.

HUN's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Chemicals Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (34) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that HUN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FULHUN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FULDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
HUNDaily Signal changed days agoGain/Loss if shorted
 
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBIO32.160.63
+2.01%
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
PXF48.970.27
+0.56%
Invesco FTSE RAFI Dev Mkts ex-US ETF
CVAR24.97N/A
N/A
Cultivar ETF
DIVB42.87-0.01
-0.02%
iShares Core Dividend ETF
KPOP15.35-0.13
-0.81%
JAKOTA K-Pop and Korean EntertainmentETF

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with AVNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then AVNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+0.75%
AVNT - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
CE - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
PPG - FUL
67%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
IOSP - FUL
66%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
MTX - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
+3.54%
More