It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FUL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FUL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.26% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.61%.
FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 15, 2025.
The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
FUL | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 28 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FUL | SNPD | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 15 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 15 days ago60% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 15 days ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% | 15 days ago75% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 15 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago59% | 17 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago55% | 22 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago63% | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
QYLG | 32.75 | 0.13 | +0.40% |
Global X Nasdaq 100® Covered Call&Gr ETF | |||
EEMS | 59.74 | 0.17 | +0.28% |
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Sm-Cp ETF | |||
CADEUR | 0.68 | N/A | N/A |
Canadian Dollar - Euro | |||
BSCT | 18.35 | N/A | -0.03% |
Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corp Bd ETF | |||
FTBD | 48.84 | -0.03 | -0.07% |
Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with IOSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then IOSP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FUL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FUL | 100% | +1.72% | ||
IOSP - FUL | 72% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
SCL - FUL | 72% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
AVNT - FUL | 71% Closely correlated | +2.17% | ||
KWR - FUL | 70% Closely correlated | -0.79% | ||
MTX - FUL | 67% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNPD has been closely correlated with BEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SNPD jumps, then BEN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNPD | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SNPD | 100% | N/A | ||
BEN - SNPD | 76% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
FRT - SNPD | 72% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
FUL - SNPD | 71% Closely correlated | +1.72% | ||
SEIC - SNPD | 71% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
TROW - SNPD | 70% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
More |