Ad is loading...
FVCB
Price
$13.76
Change
+$0.24 (+1.78%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
65 days until earnings call
SHFS
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

FVCB vs SHFS

Header iconFVCB vs SHFS Comparison
Open Charts FVCB vs SHFSBanner chart's image
FVCBank
Price$13.76
Change+$0.24 (+1.78%)
Volume$15.74K
CapitalizationN/A
SHF Holdings
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$62.34K
CapitalizationN/A
FVCB vs SHFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FVCB vs. SHFS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FVCB is a Sell and SHFS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FVCB: $13.76 vs. SHFS: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: FVCB and SHFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FVCB: 68% vs. SHFS: 84%
Market capitalization -- FVCB: $217.74M vs. SHFS: $53.09M
FVCB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $217.74M. SHFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $53.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FVCB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FVCB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FVCB is a better buy in the long-term than SHFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FVCB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHFS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FVCB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SHFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FVCB is a better buy in the short-term than SHFS.

Price Growth

FVCB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while SHFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

FVCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2025.

SHFS is expected to report earnings on Apr 14, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FVCB($218M) has a higher market cap than SHFS($53.1M). FVCB has higher P/E ratio than SHFS: FVCB (57.21) vs SHFS (3.43). FVCB YTD gains are higher at: -3.099 vs. SHFS (-75.704). SHFS has less debt than FVCB: SHFS (15.5M) vs FVCB (114M). FVCB has higher revenues than SHFS: FVCB (42.1M) vs SHFS (-27.72M).
FVCBSHFSFVCB / SHFS
Capitalization218M53.1M411%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.099-75.7044%
P/E Ratio57.213.431,668%
Revenue42.1M-27.72M-152%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt114M15.5M735%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FVCB: Fundamental Ratings
FVCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
60
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FVCBSHFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FVCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRMVX28.26-0.09
-0.32%
SEI Large Cap Value F (SIMT)
FSYJX8.82-0.03
-0.34%
Fidelity Sustainable Emerging Markets Eq
PMYCX42.22-0.55
-1.29%
Putnam Core Equity Fund C
FEUIX28.78-0.42
-1.44%
Fidelity Advisor Glbl Capital Apprec I
MIGWX27.58-0.58
-2.06%
Marsico Growth Institutional

FVCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FVCB has been loosely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FVCB jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FVCB
1D Price
Change %
FVCB100%
+1.78%
SHBI - FVCB
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
VBTX - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.48%
SFNC - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
OCFC - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
SBCF - FVCB
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.41%
More

SHFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and IFS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and IFS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHFS
1D Price
Change %
SHFS100%
+0.17%
IFS - SHFS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.86%
CLST - SHFS
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.37%
BBDO - SHFS
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.47%
BBD - SHFS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.28%
FVCB - SHFS
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.78%
More