Ad is loading...
GCXXF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
STRPF
Price
$0.25
Change
+$0.04 (+19.05%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

GCXXF vs STRPF

Header iconGCXXF vs STRPF Comparison
Open Charts GCXXF vs STRPFBanner chart's image
Granite Creek Copper
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$500
CapitalizationN/A
Starr Peak Mining
Price$0.25
Change+$0.04 (+19.05%)
Volume$14.03K
CapitalizationN/A
GCXXF vs STRPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GCXXF vs. STRPF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GCXXF is a Hold and STRPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GCXXF: $0.01 vs. STRPF: $0.25)
Brand notoriety: GCXXF and STRPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GCXXF: 1% vs. STRPF: 103%
Market capitalization -- GCXXF: $6.45M vs. STRPF: $28.63M
GCXXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $6.45M. STRPF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $28.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GCXXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GCXXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STRPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GCXXF and STRPF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

GCXXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.46% price change this week, while STRPF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -12.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
STRPF($28.6M) has a higher market cap than GCXXF($6.45M). STRPF YTD gains are higher at: -24.585 vs. GCXXF (-51.481). GCXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.97M vs. STRPF (-5.77M). STRPF has more cash in the bank: 920K vs. GCXXF (22.6K). STRPF has less debt than GCXXF: STRPF (21.5K) vs GCXXF (125K). GCXXF (0) and STRPF (0) have equivalent revenues.
GCXXFSTRPFGCXXF / STRPF
Capitalization6.45M28.6M23%
EBITDA-1.97M-5.77M34%
Gain YTD-51.481-24.585209%
P/E Ratio15.53N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash22.6K920K2%
Total Debt125K21.5K581%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STRPF: Fundamental Ratings
STRPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSZ64.760.22
+0.34%
First Trust Switzerland AlphaDEX® ETF
SEPZ40.08N/A
N/A
TrueShares Structured Outcome Sep ETF
EQWL104.61-0.81
-0.77%
Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
NETZ74.92-0.63
-0.83%
TCW Transform Systems ETF
DGRW83.13-1.03
-1.22%
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Gr ETF

GCXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCXXF and SLI have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCXXF and SLI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCXXF
1D Price
Change %
GCXXF100%
-9.03%
SLI - GCXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-11.24%
STRPF - GCXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+16.16%
FWEDF - GCXXF
12%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
FTMDF - GCXXF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
FRACF - GCXXF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.64%
More

STRPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STRPF and FLMMF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STRPF and FLMMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STRPF
1D Price
Change %
STRPF100%
+16.16%
FLMMF - STRPF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
BNNLF - STRPF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
GCXXF - STRPF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.03%
SRHYY - STRPF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOUHY - STRPF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
More