Ad is loading...
GFACX vs LGLSX
GFACX vs LGLSX Comparison
Open Charts GFACX vs LGLSX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer C
Price$70.91
Change-$0.13 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Lord Abbett Growth Leaders R4
Price$47.21
Change+$0.05 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
GFACX vs LGLSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFACX vs. LGLSX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFACX is a StrongBuy and LGLSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. LGLSX (7.16B). GFACX (0.00) and LGLSX (0.00) have matching dividends . GFACX was incepted earlier than LGLSX: GFACX (24 years) vs LGLSX (9 years). LGLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 120.00 vs. GFACX (31.00). LGLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than GFACX: LGLSX (0) vs GFACX (250). LGLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 51.95 vs. GFACX (29.12). LGLSX return over 5 years is better than : 59.55 vs. GFACX (48.44).
| GFACX | LGLSX | GFACX / LGLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.927 | 44.461 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 306B | 7.16B | 4,276% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.12 | 51.95 | 56% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.45 | -12.93 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | 48.44 | 59.55 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.85 | N/A | - |