Ad is loading...
GFAFX vs NWZMX
GFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison
Open Charts GFAFX vs NWZMX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer F1
Price$70.82
Change-$1.52 (-2.10%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr R6
Price$17.66
Change-$0.44 (-2.43%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GFAFX vs NWZMX Comparison Chart
Loading...
GFAFX vs. NWZMX commentary
Sep 08, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GFAFX is a Buy and NWZMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFAFX has more cash in the bank: 270B vs. NWZMX (191M). GFAFX pays higher dividends than NWZMX: GFAFX (0.45) vs NWZMX (0.00). GFAFX was incepted earlier than NWZMX: GFAFX (24 years) vs NWZMX (7 years). GFAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. NWZMX (12.63). GFAFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NWZMX: GFAFX (250) vs NWZMX (1000000). GFAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.31 vs. NWZMX (14.70). NWZMX (47.79) and GFAFX (46.51) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GFAFX | NWZMX | GFAFX / NWZMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.541 | 15.067 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270B | 191M | 141,361% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.45 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.31 | 14.70 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.35 | -8.59 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.51 | 47.79 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...