Ad is loading...
GLOV vs NTZG
GLOV vs NTZG Comparison
Open Charts GLOV vs NTZG
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLOV vs NTZG Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
GLOV vs. NTZG commentary
Nov 09, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLOV is a Buy and NTZG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLOV has more net assets: 1.04B vs. NTZG (6.56M). GLOV has a higher annual dividend yield than NTZG: GLOV (19.816) vs NTZG (12.414). GLOV was incepted earlier than NTZG: GLOV (3 years) vs NTZG (2 years). NTZG has a higher turnover GLOV (31.00) vs GLOV (31.00).
| GLOV | NTZG | GLOV / NTZG | |
| Gain YTD | 19.816 | 12.414 | 160% |
| Net Assets | 1.04B | 6.56M | 15,892% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 31.00 | 39.00 | 79% |
| Yield | 1.89 | 1.37 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GLOV | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QQQM | 211.35 | 3.28 | +1.58% |
| Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | |||
| FAD | 143.52 | 1.19 | +0.84% |
| First Trust Multi Cap Gr AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| BUFQ | 31.28 | 0.22 | +0.71% |
| FT Vest Laddered Nasdaq Buffer ETF | |||
| OVM | 22.09 | 0.12 | +0.56% |
| Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF | |||
| TOTL | 39.92 | 0.13 | +0.33% |
| SPDR® DoubleLine® Total Return Tact ETF | |||
GLOV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLOV has been loosely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GLOV jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOV | 100% | +1.68% | ||
| MCO - GLOV | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| BMO - GLOV | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| BN - GLOV | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| BAM - GLOV | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.83% | ||
| BNS - GLOV | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.62% | ||
More | ||||
NTZG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTZG has been loosely correlated with BMO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NTZG jumps, then BMO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTZG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTZG | 100% | N/A | ||
| BMO - NTZG | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.06% | ||
| AMZN - NTZG | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.43% | ||
| SLF - NTZG | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.21% | ||
| BHP - NTZG | 58% Loosely correlated | +3.24% | ||
| FLS - NTZG | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
More | ||||