HL
Price
$6.68
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
46 days until earnings call
USAU
Price
$5.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
68 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

HL vs USAU

Header iconHL vs USAU Comparison
Open Charts HL vs USAUBanner chart's image
Hecla Mining
Price$6.68
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.96M
CapitalizationN/A
US Gold
Price$5.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$55.82K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
HL vs USAU Comparison Chart
Loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
USAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
HL vs. USAU commentary
Sep 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HL is a Hold and USAU is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 20, 2024
Stock price -- (HL: $6.53 vs. USAU: $5.41)
Brand notoriety: HL: Notable vs. USAU: Not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HL: 160% vs. USAU: 157%
Market capitalization -- HL: $3.01B vs. USAU: $36.68M
HL [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.01B. USAU’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $36.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUSAU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • USAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the long-term than USAU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while USAU’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • USAU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HL is a better buy in the short-term than USAU.

Price Growth

HL (@Precious Metals) experienced а +10.30% price change this week, while USAU (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8992.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

HL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2024.

USAU is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.91% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HL($3.01B) has a higher market cap than USAU($36.7M). HL YTD gains are higher at: 36.414 vs. USAU (27.294). HL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 124M vs. USAU (-8.01M). HL has more cash in the bank: 106M vs. USAU (2.64M). USAU has less debt than HL: USAU (84.3K) vs HL (663M). HL has higher revenues than USAU: HL (720M) vs USAU (0).
HLUSAUHL / USAU
Capitalization3.01B36.7M8,193%
EBITDA124M-8.01M-1,547%
Gain YTD36.41427.294133%
P/E Ratio1111.11N/A-
Revenue720M0-
Total Cash106M2.64M4,020%
Total Debt663M84.3K786,477%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HL vs USAU: Fundamental Ratings
HL
USAU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
166
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
39100
SMR RATING
1..100
9096
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

USAU's Valuation (59) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HL (98). This means that USAU’s stock grew somewhat faster than HL’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for USAU (100). This means that HL’s stock grew somewhat faster than USAU’s over the last 12 months.

HL's SMR Rating (90) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as USAU (96). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to USAU’s over the last 12 months.

HL's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as USAU (44). This means that HL’s stock grew similarly to USAU’s over the last 12 months.

HL's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for USAU (100). This means that HL’s stock grew significantly faster than USAU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HLUSAU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
USAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAFMX16.130.01
+0.06%
Brown Advisory Mid-Cap Growth Instl
VYRIX10.43-0.02
-0.19%
VY® T. Rowe Price Divers Mid Cap Gr R6
JNOSX47.12-0.15
-0.32%
Janus Henderson Overseas D
FCWGX66.82-0.25
-0.37%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc529F2
CCGIX23.87-0.12
-0.50%
Baird Chautauqua Global Growth Instl

HL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HL has been closely correlated with CDE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HL jumps, then CDE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HL
1D Price
Change %
HL100%
-3.40%
CDE - HL
85%
Closely correlated
-3.16%
PAAS - HL
85%
Closely correlated
-2.25%
FSM - HL
84%
Closely correlated
-3.42%
MAG - HL
82%
Closely correlated
-3.52%
SAND - HL
78%
Closely correlated
-2.44%
More

USAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, USAU has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if USAU jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To USAU
1D Price
Change %
USAU100%
-5.91%
MAG - USAU
54%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
HL - USAU
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.40%
SILV - USAU
49%
Loosely correlated
-4.82%
CDE - USAU
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.16%
EQX - USAU
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.07%
More