IAG
Price
$16.83
Change
-$1.68 (-9.08%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
9.78B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KGC
Price
$32.06
Change
-$2.64 (-7.61%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
38.28B
7 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

IAG vs KGC

Header iconIAG vs KGC Comparison
Open Charts IAG vs KGCBanner chart's image
IAG vs KGC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

IAG vs KGC Stock Comparison: Acquisition Growth vs Operational Resilience Amid Record Gold Prices

Key Takeaways

  • Both IAG and KGC have delivered triple-digit year-to-date gains, driven by gold prices surging over 70% in 2025 amid economic uncertainty.
  • IAG's recent acquisitions in Quebec position it for expanded production capacity, contrasting KGC's focus on robust free cash flow and consistent operations.
  • KGC boasts a larger market cap and stronger profitability metrics, including higher return on equity and positive levered free cash flow.
  • IAG exhibits higher volatility with a beta of 1.90, while KGC offers relative stability and a modest dividend yield.
  • In the head-to-head, KGC edges out in valuation and financial health, appealing to risk-averse investors in the volatile gold sector.
  • Current market sentiment favors both, but KGC's operational strength may provide better downside protection if gold prices correct.

Introduction

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) are prominent mid-tier gold miners operating in diverse geographies, making them comparable for investors seeking exposure to the precious metals sector. This comparison is particularly relevant amid 2025's record gold price rally, fueled by geopolitical tensions and inflationary pressures. Traders focused on short-term momentum in commodities and long-term investors prioritizing resource diversification may find value here. By examining their business models, recent performance, and market positioning, this analysis highlights key contrasts to inform decisions in a high-volatility environment where gold acts as a safe-haven asset.

IAG Overview and Recent Performance

IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) is a mid-tier gold producer with operations primarily in Canada and West Africa, including the Cote Gold mine in Ontario, Westwood complex in Quebec, and Essakane mine in Burkina Faso. The company focuses on exploration, development, and production of gold deposits, with a portfolio emphasizing cost control and asset optimization. In recent weeks, IAG's stock has shown strong momentum, climbing over 14% in the past month amid broader gold sector gains. Key influences include the completion of acquisitions like Mines D'Or Orbec and Northern Superior, expanding its Quebec footprint and boosting future production potential. Analyst upgrades to strong buy ratings reflect optimism around earnings resilience, though negative levered free cash flow highlights ongoing capital investments. Overall sentiment remains positive, supported by gold's upward trend, but geopolitical risks in West Africa temper enthusiasm.

KGC Overview and Recent Performance

Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) is a senior gold producer with a diversified portfolio across the Americas, West Africa, and Chile, including key assets like Fort Knox in the U.S., Paracatu in Brazil, and Tasiast in Mauritania. The company emphasizes operational excellence, low-cost production, and shareholder returns through dividends. Over recent market activity, KGC's shares have advanced around 5% in the past month, building on impressive year-to-date returns. Driving factors include robust third-quarter results with record free cash flow and an upgraded credit rating from Moody's, underscoring financial discipline. Positive analyst revisions and earnings beats have bolstered sentiment, with gold price tailwinds amplifying performance. While exposed to similar sector risks, KGC's strong balance sheet and cash generation provide a buffer against volatility.

AI Trading Bot Perspective

Tickeron offers AI-driven trading bots for KGC, providing automated strategies based on advanced algorithms. The KGC AI Trading Bot operates on a 15-minute timeframe, employing momentum-based logic to identify short-term trends in gold mining volatility. It focuses on intraday swings, incorporating technical indicators for entry and exit signals. Historical data indicates consistent performance in upward markets, with factual returns showing positive outcomes during gold rallies, though past results vary by conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

IAG and KGC share exposure to the gold mining sector but diverge in scale and strategy. KGC's larger market cap of $36.3 billion dwarfs IAG's $10.4 billion, reflecting broader operations and higher revenue of $6.44 billion versus IAG's $2.23 billion. Growth drivers for IAG center on acquisitions expanding reserves in stable jurisdictions like Canada, potentially accelerating production, while KGC prioritizes organic efficiency and high-margin assets for sustained cash flow. Recent momentum favors IAG's higher beta for amplified gains in bull markets, but KGC's lower volatility and 0.47% dividend yield appeal for income-focused portfolios. Risk factors include IAG's West African geopolitical exposure versus KGC's diversified Americas focus. Market sentiment leans toward KGC for superior profitability (27.3% margin vs. IAG's 15.4%), though IAG's forward P/E of 9.24 suggests undervaluation potential.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on current trends, Tickeron's AI would likely favor KGC over IAG, given its stronger financial metrics like positive free cash flow and higher returns on equity, which indicate greater resilience in volatile gold markets. While IAG offers upside from expansion catalysts, KGC's operational consistency and dividend support provide a more balanced risk-reward profile amid potential price corrections.

VS
IAG vs. KGC commentary
Apr 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is IAG is a StrongBuy and KGC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 22, 2026
Stock price -- (IAG: $16.83 vs. KGC: $32.06)
Brand notoriety: IAG: Not notable vs. KGC: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: IAG: 215% vs. KGC: 100%
Market capitalization -- IAG: $9.78B vs. KGC: $38.28B
IAG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $9.78B. KGC’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $38.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $136.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

IAG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • IAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KGC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both IAG and KGC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

IAG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • IAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KGC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KGC is a better buy in the short-term than IAG.

Price Growth

IAG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -18.38% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.73% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -0.84%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +92.28%.

Reported Earning Dates

IAG is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

KGC is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-0.84% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGC($38.3B) has a higher market cap than IAG($9.78B). KGC has higher P/E ratio than IAG: KGC (16.44) vs IAG (14.76). KGC YTD gains are higher at: 13.989 vs. IAG (2.062). KGC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.38B vs. IAG (1.5B). KGC has more cash in the bank: 887M vs. IAG (423M). KGC (738M) and IAG (762M) have identical debt. KGC has higher revenues than IAG: KGC (7.05B) vs IAG (2.85B).
IAGKGCIAG / KGC
Capitalization9.78B38.3B26%
EBITDA1.5B4.38B34%
Gain YTD2.06213.98915%
P/E Ratio14.7616.4490%
Revenue2.85B7.05B40%
Total Cash423M887M48%
Total Debt762M738M103%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
IAG vs KGC: Fundamental Ratings
IAG
KGC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1620
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
20
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3220
SMR RATING
1..100
4831
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
778
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KGC's Valuation (20) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IAG (74). This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than IAG’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as IAG (32). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to IAG’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's SMR Rating (31) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as IAG (48). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to IAG’s over the last 12 months.

KGC's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as IAG (39). This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to IAG’s over the last 12 months.

IAG's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for KGC (78). This means that IAG’s stock grew significantly faster than KGC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
IAGKGC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
IAG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KGC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNG10.950.10
+0.92%
United States Natural Gas
NZUS36.45N/A
N/A
Stt Strt® SPDR® MSCI USA ClmtPrsAlgd ETF
YETH11.92-0.05
-0.42%
Roundhill Ether Covered Cll Strat ETF
EWC57.82-0.95
-1.62%
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
BUZZ33.61-0.61
-1.79%
VanEck Social Sentiment ETF

IAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IAG has been closely correlated with KGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IAG jumps, then KGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IAG
1D Price
Change %
IAG100%
-9.08%
KGC - IAG
85%
Closely correlated
-7.61%
AEM - IAG
85%
Closely correlated
-6.15%
CGAU - IAG
85%
Closely correlated
-8.32%
AGI - IAG
83%
Closely correlated
-9.01%
AU - IAG
82%
Closely correlated
-5.67%
More

KGC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGC
1D Price
Change %
KGC100%
-7.61%
WPM - KGC
89%
Closely correlated
-4.96%
AEM - KGC
87%
Closely correlated
-6.15%
GFI - KGC
86%
Closely correlated
-6.58%
AU - KGC
86%
Closely correlated
-5.67%
NEM - KGC
86%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
More