Ad is loading...
ISCCX vs MIDAX
ISCCX vs MIDAX Comparison
Open Charts ISCCX vs MIDAX
Federated Hermes Intl Small-Mid Co C
Price$26.48
Change-$0.21 (-0.79%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
MFS International New Discovery A
Price$31.41
Change-$0.39 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
ISCCX vs MIDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ISCCX vs. MIDAX commentary
Nov 14, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ISCCX is a Buy and MIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MIDAX has more cash in the bank: 6.12B vs. ISCCX (266M). MIDAX pays higher dividends than ISCCX: MIDAX (1.59) vs ISCCX (0.57). ISCCX was incepted earlier than MIDAX: ISCCX (29 years) vs MIDAX (27 years). ISCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. MIDAX (9.00). MIDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than ISCCX: MIDAX (1000) vs ISCCX (1500). ISCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.00 vs. MIDAX (8.68). ISCCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.32 vs. MIDAX (-4.92).
| ISCCX | MIDAX | ISCCX / MIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.364 | 2.984 | 280% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 1000 | 150% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266M | 6.12B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 1.59 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.00 | 8.68 | 184% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.49 | -18.20 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 4.32 | -4.92 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -20.21 | 21.42 | -94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...